Laserfiche WebLink
4.0 BACKGROUND <br />4.1 The property at 2435-2459 Rice Street, located in City Planning District 6 has a <br />Comprehensive Plan designation of Community Business (CB) and a corresponding <br />zoning classification of Community Business (CB) District, in which a drive-through <br />facility a requires approval as a CONDITIONAL USE. <br />4.2 Section 1009.02E of the City Code requires the applicant to validate an approval of the <br />CONDITIONAL USE by beginning site work related to the proposed drive-through. If the <br />approval has not been validated within I year, the approval will expire and become void. <br />5.0 CONDITIONAL USE ANALYSIS <br />5.1 REVIEW OF GENERAL CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA.- Section 1009.02C of the City Code <br />establishes general standards and criteria for all conditional uses, and the Planning <br />Commission and City Council must find that each proposed conditional use does or can <br />meet these requirements. The general standards are as follows.- <br />a. The proposed use is not in confTic t with the Comprehensive Plan. By its <br />recommendation to approve the application, the Planning Commission has found that <br />while a drive-through facility as proposed might not advance the goals of the <br />Comprehensive Plan aside from representing continuing investment in a commercial <br />property, it does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. <br />b. The proposed use is not in con ict with a Re la in Map or other ado ted plan. The <br />Ifl, gu p <br />proposed use is not in conflict with such plans because none apply to the property. <br />c. The proposed use is not in con f 'ic with any City COde requirements. The Planning <br />Commission found that the proposed drive-through facility can and will meet all <br />applicable City Code requirements; moreover,, a CONDITIONAL USE approval can be <br />rescinded if the approved use fails to comply with all applicable Code requirements <br />or any conditions of the approval. <br />d. The proposed use will not create an excessive burden on parks, streets, and other <br />public facilities. As a common kind of retail use in a long-standing retail location, <br />Planning Division staff does not expect the proposed use to have significant impacts <br />on any parks,, streets, or public infrastructure; by its action,, the Planning Commission <br />supported this finding. <br />e. The proposed use will not be injurious to the surrounding neighborhood, will not <br />negatively impact traffic orproperly values, and will not otherwise harm the public <br />health, safety, and general we e. If the drive-through is approved, it could add <br />vehicle trips to the local road network each day; some could argue that the additional <br />vehicles constitute a negative impact on traffic (and a violation of this general <br />criterion), but the finding in item "d" above is that the potential, additional traffic <br />would not impose an excessive burden on the public street infrastructure. Aside from <br />the potential for some additional traffic, noise related to the drive-through audio <br />equipment seems to be the only other source of impacts to surrounding properties, <br />and the zoning code's specific requirements for drive-through facilities should <br />address this concern. <br />PFI 1 -02 I—RCA-092611 (3).doc <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />