2011-09-07_PC_Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes – Wednesday, September 7, 2011 Page 9 City Engineer Bloom responded that this was Applewood Point, and it was an approved 395 use; and noted that “#3.a and B” also represented areas that had already been 396 developed and remained frozen and were not included in the allocation. 397 Chapter 1001. Definitions 398 Member Wozniak noted that the table listed parcels, and the Table in chapter 2201 399 defined what was in the table by listing blocks; and questioned why, in Twin Lakes 400 Redevelopment Area in Chapter 1022.1, parcels were instead labeled as blocks. 401 City Engineer Bloom advised that the referenced table was a remnant of the AUAR that 402 listed blocks and parcel numbers. Ms. Bloom clarified that parcel numbers were unique, 403 but blocks and lots were remnants of the AUAR on the map, noting that the map was 404 taken from the AUAR, with percentages in the AUAR on what to accomplish on each 405 block for land uses. 406 City Planner Paschke noted that land uses were established by single blocks, creating 407 some confusion. 408 Chair Boerigter directed staff to ensure those items were matched up on future drafts to 409 avoid ambiguity. 410 City Attorney Bartholdi advised that the sections would be reviewed again to ensure 411 consistency. 412 Member Boguzewski opined that it may be easier to change the map or say they were 413 synonymous. 414 City Engineer Bloom opined that “definitions” would be a good place for the revision. 415 Network Trips, Line 67 416 Member Wozniak expressed his disagreement with the proposed definition, opining that it 417 wasn’t clear as written; and suggested wording similar to the following: 418 “A vehicle trip from a parcel within the Twin Lakes Overlay District that passes 419 through a roadway infrastructure improvement identified in the AUAR during PM 420 Peak Hours that is equal to the number of roadway infrastructure improvements 421 passed.” 422 City Engineer expressed concurrence with the first portion of Member Wozniak’s 423 definition; however, she didn’t completely concur with the last part. 424 Member Boerigter suggested that language be changed in the definition from “originating” 425 to “generated.” 426 Member Wozniak opined that he preferred “originating,” however, he was amenable to 427 “generated.” 428 City Engineer Bloom opined that she wanted to see the language in writing for further 429 review before agreeing to further revision. 430 Chair Boerigter, with Commissioner consensus, agreed that Member Wozniak and staff 431 consult and redefine that particular definition. 432 Member Lester questioned if parcel trips would be determined as changes in use are 433 identified. 434 City Engineer Bloom note that, in reviewing those for developments already having 435 occurred, several had come in exact to the table; however, noted that the Park and Ride 436 had come in completely different. Ms. Bloom advised that a development proposal was 437 coming forward in the near future, and so far indications were that even though it was a 438 different use, the numbers identified for network trips appeared to be exactly the same as 439 the model projected. 440 Chair Boerigter questioned, if everyone came in with a great development that met the 441 baseline numbers, who paid for the overall area improvements. 442