Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR HRA ACTION <br />Date: 10/18/11 <br />Item No: 10.b. <br />Staff Approval: Agenda Section: <br /> Action/Discussion Items <br />Item Description: Discussion Regarding Rental Multi-Family Properties (HF 113) <br />Background <br />The Roseville HRA established the Citizen Advisory Group in May 2006 with the specific purpose of <br />reviewing options on how to potentially license rental units within the City of Roseville. The 14- <br />member Citizen Advisory Group held 6 two-hour meetings throughout the summer. The group <br />reviewed data, heard from codes, building, police and fire staff as well as reviewed other ordinances <br />and their effectiveness. The Citizen Advisory Group, supported by the HRA, recommended to the <br />City Council, among other things, that an ordinance be drafted and adopted requiring a Rental <br />Registration Program be established for single family homes, duplexes, triplexes, quads, townhomes, <br />and condos. <br />The Citizen Advisory Group did not recommend any licensing or registration for larger <br />multifamily developments. <br /> In March, 2008, the City Council approved an ordinance requiring single family homes, duplexes, <br />triplexes, quads, townhomes, and condos that were rented to register with City. No inspections <br />(interior/exterior) are conducted as part of the rental registration. The rental registration requirement <br />has created a database of information on properties that are being rented and up-to date contact <br />information regarding the owner and/or the property manager. <br />In 2010, the RHRA Board and City Council affirmed continuing the rental registration program <br />without licensing and inspections as part of the program. As part of the 2011 Work Plan, the RHRA <br />Board indicated that the idea of rental licensing for larger apartment complexes should be explored. <br />Staff agrees that we need to have some level of licensing for the larger apartment buildings in <br />Roseville. The information collected as part of the licensing will assist the City in making contact with <br />the appropriate person to deal with any problems with the property. (Similar to the rental registration <br />program for single-family homes, etc.). However, staff feels that requiring inspections as part of any <br />licensing of apartment buildings is not the best course of action, namely because of the amount of <br />resources and staff needed. Staff is also not convinced that inspections will necessarily guarantee <br />sanitary, safe, and well run apartment buildings. Inspection programs can often turn into a cat and <br />mouse game, where deficiencies are noted, several communications are made with the owner to <br />compel them to make the corrections, the minimum correction is made at the last moment, and the <br />cycle repeats itself. (See Attachment A describing several Twin Cities municipalities efforts to get a <br />landlord into compliance). <br />Instead, staff would suggest a different approach. The City of Rochester recently adopted an <br />ordinance requiring landlord licensing. Staff would like to pursue a similar ordinance requiring <br />landlords/property owners and property managers to receive a license from the city in order to rent out <br />apartment buildings. The landlord licensing would allow Roseville to collect the contact information <br />for the owners and property managers. In addition, the landlord licensing program will allow the city <br />Rental Multi-Family Discussion <br /> <br />