My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-09-06_PR_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Packets
>
2011
>
2011-09-06_PR_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2011 10:10:14 AM
Creation date
12/21/2011 10:05:52 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SH"L+E <br /> w <br /> REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> Date: 8-22-11 <br /> Item No.: <br /> Department Approval City Manager Approval <br /> Y <br /> Item Description: Consider Authorizing Approach, Method and Dollar Amount to Implement Step <br /> One of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan <br /> 1 BACKGROUND <br /> Aga At the June 20th, 2011 City Council meeting, Leisure Vision presented the findings of the <br /> 3 recently conducted statistically valid interest and opinion survey. The survey reported that the <br /> majority of residents are willing to support/invest between $8 and $10 a month (equating to <br /> 5 approximately $25 - $30 million dollars) for parks and recreation areas that are most important <br /> 6 to them. <br /> 8 At the June 20th, 2011 joint City Council/Parks and Recreation Commission meeting there was <br /> 9 a discussion on how to move forward with implementation of the recently adopted system <br /> 0 master plan in relation to the survey while considering other City Capital Improvement needs. <br /> 11 Taking the survey and other Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) needs into consideration, the <br /> 2 City Council asked the Citizen Organizing Team (COT) and the Parks and Recreation <br /> 13 Commission to recommend a funding and implementation approach. <br /> 15 At the July 11th, 2011 City Council meeting there was a review and discussion on the <br /> 16 proposed possible approaches, financing methods, time based full implementation and <br /> 1 7 specific project and costs for step one implementation. At this meeting there appeared to be a <br /> 18 general consensus that the preferred approach at this time was to focus primarily on existing <br /> 19 parks and facilities with the exception of time sensitive land acquisitions and to utilize a City <br /> 20 Council approved abatement bond funding method. Further work would include sharing the <br /> 2 1 specifics of the proposed plan with the community to gain additional feedback and to consider <br /> 22 refinements as suggested by the community and the Implementation Groups and to eventually <br /> 23 return back to the City Council with a resolution setting a public hearing date. <br /> 24 <br /> 25 Since formulating proposed step one; the COT, Parks and Recreation Commission, <br /> 26 Implementation Work Groups and staff have been sharing the specifics of the proposal with <br /> 27 the community. Specifically, there have been 13 constellation tour occasions in various <br /> 28 neighborhoods throughout the community. They have been very well attended with average <br /> 29 attendance of 100 per neighborhood. The overall proposal has been well received. By the <br /> 30 time of your meeting on August 22nd, there will be 2 additional neighborhood gatherings which <br /> 31 will complete the entire tour of the 15 Constellations. <br /> 32 <br /> Paget of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.