"Zxtract of Minutes of meeting
<br />.. of City Council
<br />City of Roseville
<br />Held: -February 14, 1983
<br />WHEREAS,, it now appears that clos ing the DN'R Metro Office and transferring
<br />its functions, to, an outstate DNR facility,, will not in any event accompli's
<br />tihe cost reduction, that was the legislative intent of HF 2190 (Laws of
<br />Minniesota for 1,982, Ch. 641, Art. lo, e
<br />ec
<br />S,., 2, Subdo 1j, 'itm
<br />ut would
<br />instead diminish the services available to the City- of Roseville and Its
<br />r i dents;
<br />es,3.
<br />NOWI. THEREFOREI BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Roseville
<br />1S opposed to closing the DNR Metro Reglon Office, and requests that the
<br />Minnesiota Legislature adopt legislat'
<br />Ion enabling the continuat-lon of the
<br />Present rie, lonal structure of the Department of Natural Resources.,
<br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting_of the City
<br />11 of the City of Roseville,. Minnesota was duly held-
<br />Councl in the City
<br />Hall in said City on Monday.. the 14th day of February, 1983, at 7:30 p.m.
<br />The following members were present
<br />III Y
<br />ing t;-
<br />and,, the foll low members were absen
<br />Member introduced the following resoluti
<br />fiy ion and moved its
<br />adoptio'n.
<br />"Y
<br />r 5. RESOLUTION NO
<br />RESOLUTICK REGARDING
<br />nti
<br />DNR METRO REGION OFFI1
<br />'WHEREAS the City of Roseville works' closely th the DNR Metro Region
<br />W1
<br />Office to plan and implement Proper management of the natural resources
<br />that are located within this Clity, and this cooperative e f fort could not
<br />be contnueld, ef fectivel
<br />i y from an outstate DNR facility; and
<br />WHEREASt, the City of Roseville has many fishing hunting related businesses
<br />that contribute to our economy, as well as a large number of anglers,
<br />and other'. outdoor sports enthusiasts who regularly utilize the
<br />..hunters.,
<br />servicies of the DNR Metro Region Of fice, and who could not be served
<br />effectively from an outstate DNR facill"Ity; and
<br />WHEREAS,, it now appears that clos ing the DN'R Metro Office and transferring
<br />its functions, to, an outstate DNR facility,, will not in any event accompli's
<br />tihe cost reduction, that was the legislative intent of HF 2190 (Laws of
<br />Minniesota for 1,982, Ch. 641, Art. lo, e
<br />ec
<br />S,., 2, Subdo 1j, 'itm
<br />ut would
<br />instead diminish the services available to the City- of Roseville and Its
<br />r i dents;
<br />es,3.
<br />NOWI. THEREFOREI BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Roseville
<br />1S opposed to closing the DNR Metro Reglon Office, and requests that the
<br />Minnesiota Legislature adopt legislat'
<br />Ion enabling the continuat-lon of the
<br />Present rie, lonal structure of the Department of Natural Resources.,
<br />
|