Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment D <br />226 Member Boguszewski agreed that this application was totally different than the previous application; <br />22`7 with the location not just immediately adjacent to residents, but also its entry spots into a residential <br />228 street away from the front of the property. As a real estate professional, Mr. Boguszewski opined that <br />229 perception could become reality, and potential perceptions that Roseville was a bad place to live based <br />2'30 on multiple pawn shops and their related activities. Given public testimony, and the absence of any <br />2'31 representative of the applicant present at tonight's meeting providing comment,, and Member <br />2'32 Boguszewski's personal opinion that he believed there was a problem with negative market values for <br />2'3'3 contiguous properties, he spoke in support of staff's recommendation to deny the request. <br />51MENW11newl <br />2'35 Member Cook moved, seconded by Member Gisselquist to RECOMMEND DENIAL of the <br />2'36 request for a pawn shop as a CONDITIONAL USE at 2057 Snelling Avenue; based on the <br />2 'N '3 1 ............ <br />7' comments and findings of Sections 4-�6; and the findings of Section 7 of the RPCA dated April 6, <br />2'38 20110 <br />2'39 Ayes: 6 <br />240 Nays: 0 <br />24 1 Motion carried. <br />Page 6 of 6 <br />