Laserfiche WebLink
MEMORANDUM <br /> To: Parks and Recreation Commission <br /> From: Lonnie Brokke <br /> Date: March 31, 2011 <br /> Re: Notes for Commission Meeting on Tuesday, May 3, 2011 <br /> 1. Introductions/Public Comment Invited <br /> Commissioners and staff will be introduced. Public participation and public comment is <br /> encouraged. <br /> 2. Approval of Minutes of the April 5, 2011 Meeting <br /> Enclosed is a copy of the minutes of April 5, 2011. Please be prepared to approve or amend. <br /> Requested Commission Action: Approve/amend minutes of the meeting of April 5, 2011. <br /> 3. Park Dedication Process Discussion <br /> At your last meeting you had two Park Dedication items on your agenda where platting and/or <br /> subdividing occurred. Specific to the Josephine Woods plat, there was a discussion about the <br /> importance of improving the process on how and when park dedication items come to the City and <br /> to the Commission. Since that time the City Council has also discussed this further and Council <br /> Member Willmus suggested further Commission discussion and a recommendation as to how that <br /> might work. <br /> Currently there is a City Development Review Committee (DRC) led by City Planner Thomas <br /> Paschke and is made up of a staff representative of all departments. All development proposals <br /> are expected to be brought to this group for review. At that point, a development is a proposal that <br /> may or may not have considered the Park Dedication factor and may have already had community <br /> meetings. The Josephine Woods Development was an example where to request a change at the <br /> point it came to the Commission was awkward. <br /> Preliminary discussions at the meeting on potential ways to improve the process was for the City <br /> to have a policy (checklist) whereby anyone wishing to develop in the City be provided the Park <br /> Dedication Ordinance first and then be required to illustrate two initial proposals; one assuming <br /> land dedication and the other assuming cash dedication or a combination. This would make Park <br /> Dedication forethought and facilitate cooperative front end involvement by the City and the <br /> Developer. Assuming land dedication, developers will then have an opportunity to have a direct <br /> impact on how Park Dedication will work into their development. <br /> Included in your packet is the Park Dedication Ordinance for your reference. <br /> General guidance from the Parks and Recreation System Master Plan on Park acquisition is to <br /> make continued effective use of the Park Dedication Ordinance. <br /> Requested Commission Action: Discussion and make a recommendation on a Park Dedication <br /> process. <br /> 4. Master Plan Implementation Discussion <br /> This is continued discussion about the "path to implementation' . <br /> Commission Representatives and staff will plan to review any progress to date. This is a time to <br /> gather further guidance/direction from the entire commission. <br /> Enclosed is a Implementation Team Newsletter and an announcement for the upcoming <br /> community meeting. <br />