2011_0613_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

1. Policy 9.2: Promote commercial development that is, accessible by transit, automobile!, walking, and bicycle. 2. Policy 11.3: Encourage! the! development of multistory office and light- industrial uses, to use land efficiently, expand the! property tax base!, and create jobs,. b. The proposed use is not in conflict with a Regulating Map or other adopted plan because no such plans apply to the area surrounding the property; C. The proposed use is not in conflict with City Code requirements, and the conditional use approval can be rescinded if the use of the drive-through fails at any time to comply with all applicable Code requirements or conditions of the approval; 0 d. The proposed drive-through should not create an excessive burden on parks, streets,, or other public facilities, since a drive-through is a typical accessory use with for a bank or financial institution,, which are permitted uses in the Community Business zoning district. e. The proposed drive-through will not be injurious to the surrounding (mostly commercial) neighborhood, will not negatively impact traffic or property values, and will not otherwise harm the public health, safety, and general welfare. WHEREAS,, the Roseville City Council has further determined that approval of the proposed CONDITIONAL USE will not result in adverse impacts to the surrounding properties based on the following findings specific to drive-through facilities.- a. The proposed drive-through has lanes and service windows that will be located along the north side of the building and directly adjacent to the parking lot and the office building, which lanes and service windows and not located between the principal structure and a public street. b. The proposed drive-through does not lie near an intersection street right-of-way. c. The site plan does indicate a pedestrian connection (could also be used for bicycles) from the sidewalk adjacent to the frontage road accessing the front of the proposed building as well as the rear of the building, which works well for pedestrians utilizing the public walkway. In the case of vehicle circulation within and around the parking lot, vehicles will access from the shared drive-lane along the south property boundary and the drive- through having been located along the north side of the building, access to it through the parking lot can be directed via the third opening into the parking lot with the use of signs. Although the parking lot is slightly deep, the site is narrow and not appropriate for a separate pedestrian from the rear portion of the lot to the building. The Planning Division believes that vehicles and pedestrians will be able to co-mingle without safety issues. d. The proposed drive-through lanes accommodate queuing for approximately 25+ vehicles or lanes that can be stacked to 5 vehicles deep, which is deemed more than adequate for Page 2 of 4