2011_0613_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

106 from the shared drive-lane along the south property boundary and the drive-through 107 having been located along the north side of the building,, access to it through the parking 108 lot can be directed via the third opening into the parking lot with the use of signs. 109 Although the parking lot is slightly deep, the site is narrow and not appropriate for a 110 separate pedestrian connection from the rear portion of the lot to the building. The III Planning Division believes that vehicles and pedestrians will be able to co-mingle 112 without safety issues. 113 d. Adequate queuing lane space shall bye pro vided without interfering with on-site 114 parking/circulation. Based on the proposed plan, there is queuing for 25+ vehicles or 115 lanes that are stacked up to 5 vehicles deep. The Planning Division has deemed that 116 queuing to be more than adequate for this use. Circulation for the site is well designed 117 and the patrons utilizing the drive-through will have a designated exit. 118 e. Speaker box sounds from he drive-through lane shall not be loud enough to constitute a 119 nuisance on an abutting residentially zoned' properly orproperly in residential use. The 120 proposed drive-through and its teller islands will lie directly adjacent a parking lot and 121 should not be a nuisance to any residential use in the area (Coventry Apartments and 122 townhomes is located approximately 475 feet to the north and the townhomes at Arona 123 are 300 feet to the east) . 124 f. Drive-through canopies and other structures, where present; shall be cons tructedfree 125 the same materials as the primary building and with a similar level of architectural 126 quality and detailing. The final design of the building and drive-through will include 127 building and roofing materials that are consistent and/or similar or complementary to one 128 another. 129 g. A I 0-foot buffer area with screen planting and an opaque wall orfence between 6 and 8 130 feet in height shall be required between the drive-through lane and any property line 131 adjoining a residentially zoned properly orproperly in residential use. This requirement 132 is not applicable to the CU request, because an office use and Community Business 133 zoned property lies directly adjacent to the north of the proposed drive-through facility. 134 5.3 Roseville's Development Review Committee, a body comprising staff from various City 135 departments,, met on May 19, 2011 to discuss the application. Comments discussed 136 relevant to the Conditional Use request included.- the northerly 30feet of this lot is 137 covered by an easement for which no structures shall be allowed, including a canopyfor 138 drive through; plans shall label and accurately indicate the easement along north 139 property boundary; and the drawings for the site need to show all underground utilities 14O and existing asements - there is public water,, storm and sanitary sewer on this site. 9 Y 141 5.4 Review of the proposed drive-through against the CONDITIONAL USE standards and 142 criteria leads Planning Division staff to conclude that the use can meet all of the 143 applicable requirements. 144 5.5 Section 1009.02E of the City Code requires the applicant to validate an approval of the 145 CONDITIONAL USE by beginning construction of the proposed improvements related to the 146 drive-through. If the approval has not been validated within one year, the approval will 147 expire and become void. 148 PF I I -O I 5RCA06131 I Page 4 of 5