My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011_0718_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2011
>
2011_0718_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2012 1:34:44 PM
Creation date
12/22/2011 9:28:44 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
179
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
31 guidelines for redevelopment predicated on pedestrian connectivity and form-based <br />32 development. The Regulating Plan will replace the Twin Lakes Urban Design Principles, <br />33 since the earlier document acts more as a checklist and/or guideline to follow and is not a <br />34 set of specific, enforceable requirements. <br />35 1.5 On May 25, 2011, the Planning Division conducted the Public Meeting regarding the <br />36 Twin Lakes Regulating Plan. The Planning Division mailed out 736 individual notices <br />37 seeking resident and property owner input into the process. Prior to the public meeting, <br />38 the Planning Division and Consultant met with the property owners within the Twin <br />39 Lakes Area and/or their representatives to review the Regulating Plan and discuss the <br />4O ideas for Twin Lakes. Owners asked a number of questions regarding the Regulating <br />41 Plan and did voice some concerns regarding the initial proposal. <br />42 1.6 A few of the main points made by property owners within Twin Lakes (or their <br />43 representatives) is that the proposal is geared more towards zoning (regulating) for a <br />44 vision and not the market. A few of the property owners also indicated that the initial <br />45 Plan appeared too prescriptive, and stated that whatever plan is approved it needs to be <br />46 flexible. <br />47 1.7 The public meeting portion of the evening was attended by 5 citizens (3 residents of the <br />48 area), 5 Planning Commission Members, 2 City Council Members and 5 Twin Lakes <br />4 property owners and/or their representatives. This meeting involved information <br />50 regarding regulating maps, an exercise in understanding how regulating plans work, as <br />51 well as initial thoughts regarding designs for the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area. <br />52 1.8 Commissioners in attendance supported the idea of linking to Langton Lake Park which <br />53 they agreed was an important amenity for the Sub Area I portion of the Twin Lakes <br />54 Redevelopment Area. Residents also agreed the park was important and making <br />55 connections was appropriate. <br />56 1.9 On June 15, 011, the Roseville Planning Commission held a special meeting/public <br />57 hearing regarding the proposed Regulating Plan for the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area. <br />58 1.10 At this meeting the City Planner and the Planning Division's Consultant, Michael Lamb, <br />59 presented to Commissioners and the public the proposed Regulating Plan, complete with <br />60 detailed text amendments. Also at the meeting/public hearing were two property owners <br />61 from the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area and two area residents. <br />62 1.11 Based on a previous meeting with property owners/representatives within the Twin Lakes <br />63 Area,, the City Planner discussed concerns raised by owners and the willingness of the <br />64 Planning Division and Consultant to review these concerns and make potential <br />65 modifications to the plan. <br />66 1.12 Specifically, at the June 15th special meeting, the following items were discussed as <br />67 potential modifications by the City Planner and Consultant.- <br />68 a. The proposed build-to line on the PIK property. This build-to line is that which <br />69 lies directly adjacent to the west side of Langton Lake Park. <br />70 b. The 60-foot wide public realm corridor roughly aligning with Iona Avenue is <br />71 proposed over the Met Council inceptor easement and would run from Mount <br />72 Ridge Road to and through Twin Lakes Parkway on the eastern end of the Twin <br />PROM I 7—RCA—RegPlan-071811 (2).doc <br />Page 2 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.