My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011_0718_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2011
>
2011_0718_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2012 1:34:44 PM
Creation date
12/22/2011 9:28:44 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
179
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
159 it would connect with Fairview Avenue. This frontage requires at least 50% of the <br />160 lineal build-to area to be occupied with the front fa ade of a building and buildings <br />161 must be placed 0-25 feet from the property line. If a building does not occupy the <br />162 build-to area,, the parking lot must include landscaping approved by the Community <br />163 Development Department. Urban Frontage sites are allowed to develop 85% of the <br />164 property. <br />165 c. Flexible Frontage Siting Build -To Area: All other frontages are to be labeled as <br />166 Flexible Frontage including the frontage adjacent to the pedestrian corridor's <br />167 connection with Iona Lane and for all areas located between the a Greenway and <br />168 Urban Frontage. This frontage allows for buildings to be placed anywhere within the <br />169 parcel, however, it is preferred that the building meet the build-to area and be placed <br />170 within 0-25 feet of a property line. Maximum lot coverage will be 85% and <br />171 undeveloped/open space areas in front of building shall be designed as a semi-public <br />172 space. <br />173 d. Park Buffer. Following the Planning Commission meeting of July 6, 2011, the <br />174 Planning Division and Consultant discussed some of the comments received from <br />175 citizens and Commissioners,, where it was decided to make the build-to area a buffer <br />176 and restrict development with a 15 foot wide setback. This buffer has now been <br />177 placed along the west and south sides and portions of the east side of Langton Lake <br />178 Park. <br />179 e. Parking Where buildings are placed further back and not within build-to area and <br />180 parking is placed in front of building, landscape will be required and/or vertical <br />181 screen will be required as approved by the Community Development Department. <br />182 f. Height and Elements Urban Frontage/Greenway/Flexible. This requirement <br />183 aligns with the Zoning Ordinance, directing individuals to the Use Chart and has no <br />184 height limitation, which is consistent with the CMU District. This section speaks to <br />185 the composition of a building which addresses the front property line. There is <br />186 prohibition of blank walls exceeding 30 feet and that primary facades (facades <br />187 fronting the Build To Areas, a Pedestrian Corridor, park or public street) of all <br />188 buildings, shall be articulated into distinct increments, by stepping back or extending <br />189 forward, use of storefronts, with separate windows, and entrances,- arcade awnings, <br />190 bays, and balconies,- variation in roof lines,- use of different but compatible materials, <br />191 and textures,. For Greenway Frontage there is a requirement that buildings, be <br />192 steppe -back after the second story. <br />193 g. Landscaping. In addition to the landscaping requirements of Section 1011.03 of the <br />194 City Code, the Urban, Greenway, and Flexible Frontages are required to install one <br />195 tree for every 30 lineal feet of property. In Flexible frontage there need to be <br />196 foundation plantings adjacent to a vertical screen and where parking is placed within <br />197 the build-to area a vertical screen at least 36 inches tall shall be approved by the <br />198 Community Development Department. <br />199 3.4 As it pertains to the existing Design Standards articulated in Section 1005.02 of the <br />200 Zoning Ordinance,, there are two that require slight modifications in order to better align <br />201 with the Regulating Plan and realities of site development. Specifically, we do not <br />202 anticipate that the developments in Twin Lakes will have entrance orientation adjacent to <br />203 all street frontages, nor do we believe it is in the City's best interest to require such a <br />PROM I 7—RCA—RegPlan-071811 (2).doc <br />Page 5 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.