Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment B <br />1 EXTRACT FROM THE JUNE 15, 2011 <br />2 SPECIAL MEETING OF THE ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br />3, <br />4 1. Public Hearings <br />5 Vice Ch�aiir Gisse1quist re'viie'we'd the purpose an�d process for puck l�iic hearings h�e'l�d before the Planning <br />6 Cormrmiissiion�. <br />7 a. PROJECT FILE 001 7 <br />8 Request by the Community Development Department to create a Zoning Overlay District <br />9 over the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area <br />10 Vice Ch�aiir Gisse1quist ope'ne'd the Puibl�iic Hearing at 6:55 p.rm. <br />11 Ciity Pl�an�n�e'r Thomas Paschke briie'fl r suimm mariize'd the process to-date iin the de've'l�opmme'n�t, <br />12 con siide'ratiion s an�d re'viisiion s for the Re' guil�atiin Map an�d Plan for the Twiin Lakes Re'de've'l�opmme'n�t <br />13, Area (PROJOO 17). Mr. Paschke re'viie'we'd the timetable and backgrouin�d for de've'l�opmme'n�t of the <br />14 Map an�d Plant, iin�cl�uidiin re'ce'nt puibl�iic rme'e'tiin s an�d ope'n h�ouise's an�d suibse'q�uie'n�t diiscuissiion s <br />15 among staff, con�su l�tan�ts an�d prope'rty own�e'rs irn the Twiin Lakes area. As a re'su�l�t of those <br />16, rme'e'tiin s, Mr. Paschke adviise'd that the proposed de'sii gn standards head been re'laxe'd some from <br />17 th�e'iir original format at the su gge'stiion of and addressing some of the concerns expre'sse'd by <br />18 prope'rty owners and th�e'iir abiil�iity to m�arke�t and de've'lop th�e'iir prope'rtiie's. Th�iis backgrou�n�d <br />19 iinforrmatiion was de'taine'd iin the Re'q�uie'st for Planning Cormrmiissiion ,ctiion dated June 15, 2011. <br />20 Mr. Paschke iin�trodu�ce'd Michael Lamb of the Cu n�iinighiam Group to re'viie'w the Twiin Lakes Urban <br />21 Standards (Draft 6/10/11) iin more de'taiil�. Through a PowerPoint pre'se'ntatiion, Mr. Lamm re'viie'we'd <br />22 the seven (7) page h�an�dou t and proviide'd rationale for re'cormrme'nde'd u rban de'sii gn standards iin� <br />23, the Twiin Lakes Re'de've'l�oprme'nt Area. <br />24 <br />Michael L,amb, Cuningham Group <br />25 <br />Mr. Lamm be' an h�iis pre'se'ntatiion by re'viie'wiin g the backgrou�n�d of the process to-date, iiniitiiate'd by <br />26, <br />the Ciity 11s Zoning Code update and de'sii gn�atiion�, gu iide'd by the 2030 , Comprehensive Plan, of the <br />27 <br />area as a Cornrne'rciial�/Miixe'd Use District and the purpose of that District, de've'l�oprme'nt and <br />28 <br />ongoing re'fiine'rme'nt of u rban de'sii gn uiiide'l�iine's for the District to achieve that pu�rpose', iin�pu�t <br />29 <br />through rme'e'tiin With the Ciity Couin�ciil�, land owners, and oth�e'r rne'rnbe'rs of the pu�bl�iic through <br />3,0 <br />variiouis pu bl�iic meefings. <br />3,1 As de'taine'd iin Se'ctiion 2.2 of the staff report, the Re' guil�atiin Map iide'ntiifiie's three (3,) pu�bl�iic <br />3,2 con�n�e'ctiion�s and /or corridors l�iin�kiin to Langton Lake Park, the major arme'niity of the de've'l�oprme'n�t <br />1 <br />area that i�s the focu�s of providing social con�n�e'ctilon�s across prope'rtile's and con�n�e'ctitn to the Park <br />3,4 to emphasize thins puI bl�iIc re'al�rm am e�n�ilty. <br />3,5 <br />As part of the pre'se'ntatiion, Mr. Lamm h�ii gh�l�ii gh�te'd parks, e'xiistiin g and proposed e'ase'rme'nts <br />3,61 <br />providing e'ast/we'st con n�e'ctiion�s for connectivity, and u till iitiie's between Fairview and Cle've'land <br />3,7 <br />Ave'nuie's providing e'xiistiin ch�aracte'riistiics and /or con�diitiion�s that have a barriie'r on de've'l�oprme'nt <br />3,8 <br />and how t® accommodate those iite'rms; iin addiitiion t® area fe'atu�re's u�se�d as the kasha t ®r the <br />3,9 <br />Re'guil�atiin g Map, iin�cl�u diin Mount Ridge Road and Twiin Lakes Parkway (both portiions of the <br />40 <br />roadway that are cu�rre'ntl r e'xiistiin g and those ye�t proposed for cormpl�e'tiion ). <br />41 Twiin Lakes Urban Standards (DRAFT 05/°10/1 1 <br />42 Page's 2 — 5 <br />43, Mr. Larmb noted the variiouis re'gu�l�atiions iide'ntiifiie'd iin the Re'guil�atiin g Map, th�e'iir specific definitions <br />44 and how de've'l�oprme'nt wou�l�d be re' gu�l�ate'd iin e'ach�, and differentiations iin e'ach�: Gre'e'nway <br />45 Frontage's, Urban Frontage, Flexible Frontage, and De�diicate'd Pu bl�iic Corriidors/Gre'e'nways. <br />