2011_0718_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

46 Mr. Lam "s presentation iin�cl�uide'd identifying pui bl�iic realm con n�e'ctiionr s with three e'n�try poiin is iin�to 47 Langton Lake Park (re'fe'r Section 2.2 of the staff re'port), and the 3,00-400" diiamme'te'r con�n�e'ctiion�s 48 poiin�ts that wou�l�d require pui bl�iic dedication iin�to the park with some fl�e'xii biil�iity for those corer 7e'ctiionr s 49 de'pe'n�diin on how de've'l�opm�e'n�t proposals come forward. 50 Mr. Lam re'viie'we'd variiou�s de've'l�opm�e'n�t e'xammpl�e's of each identified buiiil�diin frontage option an�d 51 how th�e'y m�ay look in conjunction with pui bl�iic corer nr e'ctors or am�e'n�iitiie's to define space's an�d 52 ove'rl�ookiin an�d adjace'n�t to pedestrian am e'n�iitiie's. Fuirth�e'r re'viie'w iin�cl�uide'd parkiin setbacks, buiiil�d- 53, to are'as, an�d how the flexible frontage buiiil�diin are'as were sii m�iil�ar to past de've'l�opm e n�t looks, with 54 .1 bu�i�l�di�n�gs si�te�d in the middle of the l�ot, bu�t re�q�u�i�ri�n�g physical vertical scre�e�n�i�n an�d l�an�dscapiin to 55 define the prope�rty edge or bouin�dary. 56, At th�iis tiimme', Mr. Lam�b e'nde'd h�iis formal presentation to h�e'ar com�mme'n�ts an�d quic'stiionr s of the 57 Com��iissiionm. 58 Discussion by Mr. Lam�b, staff and Com�m�iissiion e'rs 59 Me'rmbe'r Boguszewski re�fe�re�nr ce'd the Re�gu�l�atiin g Map (page 2), and clarified that the 610 re�com�m�e'n�datiion�s pre�se�n�te'd for variiou�s frontage de'siign atiion�s were base'd on h�iis fiirm"s juidgm�e'n�t 611 and iin�puit re�ce'iive'd at the puck l�iic rme'e'tiing. 612 Mr. Laren b cony cuirre'd, n otiin g that multiple rme'e'tiin gs had been hee�l�d to-date with staff, as well as the 613, fe'e'dback re'ce'iive'd from the puck l�iic an�d l�an�down�e'rs; an�d the ultimate atte'rmpt t® re'spon�d t® those 614 cormmme'n�ts an�d con�ce'rn�s an�d focuis more on the iim�portan�t iterns (con�n�e'ctiion�s an�d iim�proviin�g 615 am�e'n�iitiie's to Langton Lake Park), an�d the re�q�uie'st of l�an�down�e'rs to be more flexible to facilitate 616, de've'l�opm�e'n�t optiionr s, e'spe'ciial�l r amount the pe'riirme'te'rs of Cle've'land Ave'n�uie', Couin�ty Road C, an�d 617 Faiirviie'w Ave'n�uie'. Mr. Larmb adviise'd that, as de've'l�opm�e'n�t mmove's cl�ose�r to the Lakes stan�dards 618 were re'com�m�e'n�de'd for a more striict an�d specific appl�iicatiionr . Mr. Lam�b n�ote'd those were de'fiin�e'd 619 as gre'e'n�way from tage's to define pui bl�iic corer nr c'ctiionr s an�d h�ol�d the corer e'rs al�on the Parkway an d 70 suirrouunr diin the parks. 71 Mr. Paschke adviise'd thl at the atte'm�pt was to be more respectful an�d responsive to the cuirrecnr t 72 docuimme'n�t guiiidiin de've'l�opm�e'n�t, e'n tiitl�e'd "Twin Lake�s Urban Design Priin�ciipal�s," de've'l�ope'd uin�de'r 73, the pre'viiou�s Zon�iin Code'. 74 Mr. Larmb n�ote'd that th�iis its a different way to approach zoning, n�ot focuise'd on actual uise', buit 75 l�iistiin approved uise's in the cuirrecnr t Zonr iin Code'. Mr. Larmb clarified that the Re'gu�l�atiin Map its n�ot 76, so corer ce'rn�e'd about the uise', al�l�owiin for fl�e'xii biil�iity for future de've'l�opm�e'n�t, buit focusing on 77 corer ce'rn�s for a more predictable de've'l�opm�e'n�t pattern that has a re'al�iistiic reclIatiionr sh�iip to the pui bl�iic 78 re'a I m�. 79 Me'm�be'r Boguszewski q�uie'stiionr e'd iif th�iis wou�l�d in effect regulate the buiiil�diin facade's, h�e'iigh�ts, 80 se'tbacks an�d from tage's — n�o rmatte'r what the de've'l�opm�e'n�t — buit be base'd on in which from to 81 designation a partiicuil�ar use was located. 82 Mr. Larmb re�sp nr de'd affiirrmatiive'l r. 83, Me'rmbe'r Boguszewski opiin�e'd thl at iit seerned like a h�ii gh�e'r percentage of l�iin�e'ar from tage's were 84 de'sii gne'd as flexible than orii giin�al�l an�tiiciipate'd, end how workable thl at wou�l�d be', end how 85 de've'l�oprme'nt was e'nviisiionne'd if iit was more restrictive of corners, buit re'l�axe'd in the rmiiddl�e', end 86, wh� e'th� e'r th at m�iitii gate'd re'striictiionns on the entire block (reference Cle've'land Avenue between Twin 87 Lake's Parkway and lone). 88 Mr. Lam�b noted th� at a re'culrriin therne from prope'r'ty owne'rs through the pui bl�iic rme'e'tiin process 89 was t® avoiid z ®n iin for vision as oppose'd t® the preferred zon�iin for the rmarke't; end initial 90 conce'rns e'xpre'sse'd by those de've'l�ope'rs ®n re'striIctiIons ®f the propose'd Re' guil�atiin g Map. Mr. 91 Larmb adviise'd th� at, base'd on those recurring cormrme'nts end concerns, atte'rmpts were made to 9 2 addre'ss both the Ciity 11s vision end rmarke't re'al�iitiie's of the prope'rty owne'r/de've'l�ope'r. Mr. Larmb