2011_0718_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

23,4 away uise's for that area, an�d whe't he'r there couil�d be more flexibility with the buiiil�d-to l�iin�e's as the 23,5 buiiil�diin from te'd that e'ase'mme'n�t. Mr. Paschke opiin�e'd that consideration couil�d ce'rtaiin�l be given for 236 the approach to be softened to fiit more of a variie'ty of uise's. Mr. Paschke adviise'd th�at, With th�iis 23,7 corriidor m�an�date'd over that e'xiistiin�g e'ase'm�e'n�t, iit cre'ate'd an uin�de've'l�opabl�e', l�an�dl�ocke�d parce'l�, 23,8 an�d sh�ouil�d be addre'sse'd. If the corriidor re'mmaiin�e'd as iis, Mr. Paschke n�ote'd that iit took that portion 23,9 of the parcel oust of the e'q�uiatiion , an�d n�e'e'de'd fuirth�e'r th�oui gh�t for additional flexibility. 240 Me'mm be'r Wozn�iiak n�ote'd tIl at the l�an�dl�ocke'd parcel diid n�ot have fre'e'way frontage de'sii gn�atiion . 241 Mr. Paschke con�cuIrre'd, howe've'r, n�ote'd tIl at iit was marrow, with Ali® parkiin�g; an�d warran�te'd fuirth�e'r 242 con�silde'ratiIon�. 243, Associate Plant n�e'r Bryan Lloyd n�ote'd site e'n�tran�ce's with buiiil�d-to areas at the corn e'r an�d the 244 corriidor off lon�a th�at l iimmiite'd access to the siite', with access iin�diicate'd between Twin Lake�s Parkway 245 an�d lon�a cast of the bu iil�d-to line where the roue n�dabouit was located goiin cast al�on Twin Lake�s 246 Parkway. Mr. Lloyd opiin�e'd th�at the question was whe't he'r fu rth�e'r consideration coin �l�d be given, 247 while re'm�aiin�iin sensitive t® what was al�re'ady th�e're�; again adh�e'riin t® a Plan pre'diicate'd t® the 248 Ciity 11 s viisiion�, bust re'cogn�iiziin mmarke't re'al�iitiie's; an�d that mmay indicate access con�n�e'ctiin t® Iona. 249 Me'mm be'r Boguszewski q�uie'stiion�e'd how tIl at parcel-specific fl�e'xii biil�iity wou�l�d be docu�mec'n�te'd. 250 Mr. Paschke adviise'd tIl at iit wou�l�d n�ot be l�iiste'd as specific e'xce'ptiIol s, bust addre'sse'd through 251 flexibility within the puff bl�iic connection circle (e'. g. to the park) addre'sse'd in the 350 -400'' radiiu s. 252 Mr. Lamm coot cu�rre'd, n�otiin the pu bl�iic de'diicate'd corriidor con�n�e'ctiin to the park. 253, Me'mm be'r Boguszewski re'cogn�iize'd th�at the Re�gu�l�atiin Map was a different approach than zoning, 254 an�d was a work in progress at th�iis poiin�t. Howe've'r, he q�u�e�stiion�e'd if the con�ce'pt was th�at the 255 Re�gu�l�atin Map wou�l�d be e'te'rn�al�l r work in progress; an�d q�u�e�stion�e'd if that was the con1 ce'pt, how 256, wou�l�d an�y action taken by the Commission at ton�n gh�t"s mme'e'tin t® re'commmme'n�d approval make an�y 257 difference ®r fiat in�to the overall process that wou�l�d aII ®w for on onn additional adju�stmme'n�ts; ®r 258 whe't he'r approval n�e'e'de'd t® be con�dition�e'd on future amme'n�dmme'n�t(s). 259 Mr. Paschke advised that, since ton�n gh�t"s mme'e'tin was n�ot e'in tele'vise'd ®r re'corde'd for de'l�aye'd 2610 vie'win�g, he wou�l�d suigge'st that the Pui bl�i�c He'ari�n�g be con�ti�n�u�e�d t® the Com�m�i�ssi�on�"s Ju�l�y 6, 2011 2611 m�e'e'ti�n�g, t® aII ®w re'cordi�n�g for pu�bl�i�c docu m�e'n�tati�on�. Given the fact that staff was still re'fe'rri�n�g t® 2612 the Re�gu�l�atin Map an�d Plan as a "worki�n docu m�e'n�t." Given that staff Mad in�dicate'd t® the 2613, Commission those on oin discu�ssii on�s an�d con�side'rati on�s based on puff bl�Ic an�d prope'rty own�e'r 2614 C®tl1ilm e 'nl t, some ye't t® be articu�l�ate'd t® the p oint th�e' y wou�l�d be beneficial for the Commission ®r 2615 pu�bl�ic t® con�side'r at th�iis poinit, he reite'rate'd that staff wou�l�d recommendation continuation ®f 2616, ton�i gh�t"s He'ari�n t® ell ®w for a more formal recommendation to be formulated. 2617 Re'l�ate'd to whe'the'r th�iis docu�mm e'n�t wou�l�d be in flux all the tiimme', Mr. Paschke adviise'd that iit wou�l�d 2618 n�ot be in flux once approved; howe've'r, he diid note that if a proj I e'ct came forward in the fuItuIre', n1 o 2619 m atte'r whe'the'r a residential or commercial ulse', an�d if modifications to the Map an�d Plan were 270 iin�diicate'd, there wou�l�d be an option to eme'nl d the Plan an�d Map siim+ iil�ar to emme'nl dmme'n�ts to oth�e'r 271 Ciity Code an�d Ordiin�anl ce's. 272 Me'tl1 be'r Boguszewski re'cognt ize'd the tim�in con�strain�ts in ge'ttin th�iis Plan an�d Map approve'd; 273, howe've'r, he re'q�u�e'ste'd that, if the Hearing was to be con�tin�u�e'd, those adju�stmme'nl is wound be 274 in�cl�u�de'd on a re'vise'd Re' guil�atin Map s® that whet was pre'se'nt te'd at that mme'e'tin wouil�d in�cl�u�de 275 those iterns discu�sse'd. 276, Mr. Paschke advise'd tIl at there was stron inte're'st am�on many partie's in ge'ttini g somme'th�in�g 277 adopte'd; howe've'r, he opin�e'd tIl at adoptin somme'th�in tIl at wou�l�dnl "t u�l�timmate'l r work ®r h�ad m�aj I or 278 ch�al�l�e'nl e's was n�ot pru�de'n�t; an�d assu�re'd Commmmission�e'rs tIl at the de'l�ay was due t® staff's atte'tl1 pts