|
418
<br />an�d Mr. Lam�b on whe'the'r there were opportuIn�iitiie's that couIl�d be con siide're'd as some type of trade
<br />419
<br />off on parce'l�s to incorporate more flexible de'sii gn standards (e'. g. stretch of gre'e'n�way frontage that
<br />420
<br />the de've'l�ope'r be al l�owe'd to buliil�d parkiin on iin exchange for e'xte'nd iin uIrban frontage on a corn e'r
<br />421
<br />se' gmme'n�t Ali® cuIrre'n�tl r sh�ownl as uIrbanl fronitage', bust still desirable as an ilnte'rse'Ctil®n feature; ®r Ali®
<br />422
<br />scre'e'nlilnl g for parkilnl g if n®t ne'ce'ssary due t® adjace' n�t ope'n space ilnl exchange for somme'th�iln e'lse',
<br />423,
<br />such as iln�cre'ase'd uIrbanl frontage'). Me'mm be'r Woznlilak suIgge'ste'd that such compromises moray be t®
<br />424
<br />e've'ryon�e'"s advantage t® initiate stanIdards for the area that wouIl�d encourage de've'l�opmme'n�t, wilth�ouIt
<br />425
<br />abandoning ilde'as for ope'n space', park access, multi-modal transit optiIon�s, anId oth�e'r goals anId
<br />426,
<br />visions from the Imagine Roseville 2025 commmmulnIilty visioning process anId 2030 , Comprehensive
<br />427
<br />Pl�anI gulilde'l�ilnle's. Me'mm be'r Woznlilak opiln�e'd that those goals anId visions nIe'e'de'd t® be re'tailnle'd.
<br />428 Mr. Paschke assuIre'd Commissioners tIl at staff was atte'mmptiln t® re'tailnl those goals anId vilsil on�s.
<br />429 Vice Ch�aiir Giisse'l�q�uliist spoke iin suIpport of the atte'mmpt to iimmpl�e�mme'n�t more flexible frontage to
<br />43,0 address buIsiln�e'ss own�e'r con ce'rns; howe've'r, he opiin�e'd tIl at tIl at he diidn�"t watt the docu me'n�t to be
<br />43,1 a "work ilnl progre'ss," buIt wanite'd the Re' guIl�atilnl g Map ilnl place t® guide de've'l�opmme'n�t as e'nivilsilon�e'd
<br />43,2 bust also t® be re�al�iIstiIc.
<br />433
<br />Vice Ch�aiir Giisse'l�q�uIiist asked that, iif the PuIbl�iic Hearing was continued to JuIl r, staff an�d Mr. Lammb
<br />43,4
<br />retum with a final plan for the Comm miissiion to vote uIp or down for re'com�m�e'n�datiion to the Ciity
<br />43,5
<br />CouIn�ciil�. Understanding that the viisiion an�d re'al�iity were a fine bal�an�ciin act, Vice Ch�aiir Giisse'l�q�uIiist
<br />43,61
<br />n�ote'd Mr. Ran�con�e' "s an�d other de've'l�ope'rs" con�ce'rn�s for flexibility an�d zone iin for the mmarke't ve'rsuIs
<br />43,7
<br />zone iin for the viisiion , while recognizing pe'n�diin environmental cl�e�an�uIp costs. Vice Ch�aiir
<br />43,8
<br />Giisse'l�q�uIiist n�ote'd h�iis desire to encourage de've'l�opmme'n�t, n�ot discourage iit, buIt was uIn�cl�e'ar on h�ow
<br />43,9
<br />much the Commmmilssil on�"s de'cilsilon�-moralism g wouIl�d impact de've'l�opmme'n�t; buIt e'xpre'sse'd hails concern
<br />440
<br />that the nIe'w de'sil gnl stanIdards anId zon�iln code doe'sn�"t e'nId uIp l�ookiln a I®t like the ol�d zoning
<br />441
<br />code'.
<br />442
<br />Mr. Paschke opilnIe'd that he dildnI "t share those con�ce'rnls that ilt mmilghit, bust died note that the ol�d code
<br />443,
<br />an�d process was no diiffe're'n�t with iits re'striictiion s iin what cou�l�d be de've'l�ope'd iin Twiin Lake's by
<br />444
<br />re'q�uliiriin uIrban design priin�ciipl�e's be met or ach�iie've'd. Mr. Paschke assuIre'd the Comm miissiion , an�d
<br />445
<br />the puIbl�iIc, that staff was ve'ry aware not t® re'striIct de've'l�opmme'n�t with t®® mmanly re�gu�l�atilon�s;
<br />446,
<br />howe've'r, he opiln�e'd that n�o mmatte'r what the re' guIl�atilon�s are', de've'l�opmme'n�t ils difficult anId ciltile's
<br />447
<br />created zon�iln re' guIl�atilon�s for a re�ason�, whether for n�ow ®r ilnl the fuItuIre'. Mr. Paschke opiln�e'd that
<br />448
<br />the Cilty anId ilts staff owed ilt t® ilts ciltilze'n�s t® provide gulildilnl g docuImme'n�ts for that de've'l�opmme'n�t, ®r t®
<br />449
<br />re-think the vilsil on�. Mr. Paschke fuIrth�e'r opilnIe'd that, if th�iIs ils not the correct pl�anI t® mme'e't the Lilt y 11 s
<br />450
<br />vilsilon�, th�e�nI ilt nIe'e'de'd t® be re'thIou�gh�t. Howe've'r, Mr. Paschke n�ote'd that th�ils proposed Re' guIl�atilnlg
<br />451
<br />Map anId P anI ils a ditre'ct re'suIl�t ®f the Imagine Roseville 2025 commmmulnIilty visioning process anId the
<br />452
<br />uIpdate'd 2030 , Comprehensive Pl�anI that puIt those uIrbanI designl priln�cilpal�s ilnl place'.
<br />453, Vice Chl ailr Gilsse'l�q�uIilst q�uIe'stilon�e'd how set the guIildilnI g priln�cilpl�e's were for frontage's.
<br />454
<br />Mr. Paschke advilse'd that, from that standpoint, there were Ali® internal prope'rty l�ilnle's; buIt bitg
<br />455
<br />parce'l�s with bulilld -t® l�ilnle's ®r setback l�ilnle's anId additional re'q�ulilre'mme'n�ts for that gilve'nI area. If
<br />456,
<br />someone bouI gh�t all the property iin the Twiin Lake's Re'de've'l�opmme'n�t Are'a, Mr. Paschke opiin�e'd that
<br />457
<br />the' y wou�l�d ste'e'd to remove the e'xiistiin pu�bl�iic road, h�aviin re'ce'iive'd Ciity suIpport to do so, of
<br />458
<br />course'. Mr. Paschke noted there wou�l�d also be a re'q�u�iire'mme'n�t for additional environmental re'viie'w
<br />459
<br />agaiin�st the UAR, impacts on roadways, an�d oth�e'r iite'mms to con�siide'r. Mr. Paschke adviise'd that,
<br />4610
<br />ju st because a de've'l�ope'r wan�te'd to do so, they wou�l�d still ne'e'd to go through variiouis steps before
<br />4611
<br />se'e'kiin an amendment to the Re' guIl�atiin Map an�d Plan, siimmiil�ar to re'q�u�iire'm�e'n�ts for an amendment
<br />4612
<br />to the Zoning Code', after the final Map an�d Plan area adopted by the Ciity Cou n�ciil�. Mr. Paschke
<br />4613,
<br />adviise'd that the Ciity, an�d iits staff, its always ope'n to an�y con�ve'rsatiion�.
<br />4614 Me'mm be'r Cook sugge'ste'd tII at, pritor to the Ju�l�y m�e'e'tiln an�d con�tiln�u�atilon of the Pu�bl�iIc Hearing;
<br />4615 staff brtn s forward the con�ce'rn�s of respective prope'rty own�e'rs for the Commmmilssilon�"s aware'ne'ss
<br />4616, artd consilde'ratilo t of the+ 'iIr specific conce'rrts.
<br />
|