|
Attachment C
<br />1 EXTRACT OF THE JULY 6 ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
<br />2 1. Public Hearings
<br />3,
<br />Chant Boerii gter reviiewed the purpose and process for puibl�iic h�eariin s held before the Pl�an�n�iin�g
<br />4 Commission.
<br />5 a. PROJECT FILE 001 7
<br />6 Request by the Community Development Department to establish a regulating plan t ©r the
<br />7 Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area as required by the City Code
<br />8 Chant Boerii gter opened the Puibl�iic He�ariin at 6:3,3, p.m.
<br />9 Ciity Planner Thomas Paschke briie�fl adviise�d thl at the Re uil�atiin Map and Plan for the Twin lke
<br />�as
<br />10 Re�de�ve�l�opm�e�n�t Area head been fuirth�e�r re�viise�d (DRAFT dated June 3,0, 201 °1 for re�viie�w and
<br />11 consideration at ton ii gh�t"s mme�e�tiin . Mr. Paschke n�ote�d thl at these fuirth�e�r re�viisiion s were staff's
<br />12 recornmendations for l�e�ss restrictive re uil�atiion�s for the Map and Plat, and were a diire�ct re�suil�t of
<br />13, puck l�iic and Commissioner cornment at the Pu�bl�iic He�ariin held at the Special Pl�an�n�iin Commission
<br />14 on Ju l r 15, 2011; and su bse�q uie�n�t mme�e�tiin s with Twin Lakes prope�rty own�e�rs.
<br />.1
<br />15 For the record, Mr. Paschke meted the re�ce�i�pt of written comments, in opposiitiion�, dated Ju�l�y 6)
<br />16, 2011 from Attorn�e John Paul Martiin�, with the firrn of Martin & Sq�u�iire�s, P. A., Attorn�e of Re�cord
<br />17 for Dorso Bu iil�diin Company, own�e�r ®t the parcel at 2814 N Cl�e�ve�l�an�d Ave�n�u�e�; attached hereto
<br />18 and made' a part hereof. Mr. Paschke n�ote�d thl at th�iis was in addition t® the June 3,0, 2011 letter
<br />19 from th�iis law firrnl for Dorso thl at head been iin�cl�u�de�d in the mme�e�tiin age hide packe�t mmate�rtal�s.
<br />20 Mr. Paschke iin�trodu�ce�d Michael Lamb of The Cuningharn Grouip to re�viie�w the Twin Lakes Urban
<br />21 Standards (Draft 6/3,0/11) in more detain.
<br />22 Michael L,amb, Cuningham Group
<br />23, Mr. Lamb proviide�d a re�viie�w of the Re�guil�atiin Map, as re�viise�d, and the propose�d l�ocatiion�s of
<br />24 Gre�e niway, Urban and Flexible Fronitage�s, and rationale for e�diits and modifications fol�l�owiin fuirth�e�r
<br />25 discussion with commercial prope�rty own�e�rs in the Twin Lakes Re�de�ve�l�opm�e�n�t Area, and th�e�iir
<br />26, con�ce�rn�s with the propose�d Map and Plan be�iin too re�striictiive�, th�e�re�by th�wartiin the successful
<br />27 m�arke�tiin an�d/or re�de�ve�l�opm e�n�t of th�e�iir prope�rtiie�s. Mr. Lamb meted thl at the most significant
<br />28 relaxation of the propose�d design standards iin�vol�ve�d the bu iil�d-to line alone Coin n�ty Road C-2, and
<br />29 was base�d on certain soil con�diitiion�s. Howe�ve�r, Mr. Lamb adviise�d the pre�viiouisl r-addressed
<br />3,0 l�ocatiion�s re�q�uiiiriin puibl�iic connection to Langton Lake Park were still in place, butt there was l�e�ss
<br />3,1 specificity to an exact location for the at con�n�e�ctiion�. Mr. Lamb n�ote�d the at the most visible or
<br />3,2 prorninent corn�e�rs re�taiin�e�d re�q�uiiire�d puibl�iic and pedestrian con�n�e�ctiion�s while al�l�owiin more flexible
<br />fron�tage�s (e�.g. Fairview, loot a, Cleveland, and Twin Lakes Parkway) where appl�iicabl�e�.
<br />3,4 Mr. Lamb re�viie�we�d the specifics for each of the three (3,) Fron�tage�s, and applicable re�viisiion�s, as
<br />3,5 detained in the Re�q�u�e�st for Pl�an�n�iin Commission Action dated Ju�l�y 6, 2011. Mr. Lamb proviide�d
<br />3,61 illustrative e�xammpl�e�s of the variiou s front to es, addre�ssiin vertical and /ter landscape scre�e�n�iin for
<br />3,7 setbacks and parkiin , de�pe�n�diin on the actual siitiin of buiiil�diin s as de�ve�l�opm�e�n�t occurs.
<br />3,9 Mr. Lamb e�m�ph�asiize�d the n�e�e�d to continue to facilitate the puck l�iic realm con�n�e�ctiion�s to Langton
<br />40 Lake alone Coin n�ty Road C-2, cast and west of the Lakes and the loot a Corriidor/Gre�e�n�way, while
<br />41 al�l�owiin flexibility on the Metropolitan Couin�ciil�'i s easernent. On Page 7 of the re�viise�d Plea, Mr.
<br />42 Lamb re�viie�we�d detains of the proposed puibl�iic realm con�n�e�ctiion�s and how th�e r wou�l�d work with
<br />43, buiiil�diin re�l�atiion�sh�iip and spe�ciifiicatiion�s of each. Mr. Lamb n�ote�d the at the Langton Lake connection
<br />44 on the cast its a pedestrian pathway, and was proposed to occur on pu bl�iic prope�rty, and wou�l�d not
<br />45 be imposed over private prope�rty.
<br />
|