My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011_0718_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2011
>
2011_0718_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2012 1:34:44 PM
Creation date
12/22/2011 9:28:44 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
179
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
46 Mr. Lam�b an�d Mr. Paschke addre'sse'd com�mme'n�ts an�d q�uie'stiion s of the Com�m�iissiion at th�iis tiimme'. <br />47 Qu�e�sti�on�s of Commissioners <br />48 At the re'q�uie'st of Me'mm be'r Cook, Mr. Lamm n�ote'd tIl at the Me'tropol�iitan Cou�n�ciil�'i s iin�te'rce'ptor <br />49 e'ase'mme'n�t was an e'xiistiin e'ase'mme'n�t tIl at the Plea atte'mmpte'd to take advantage of iin con�n�e'ctiin to <br />50 Lan�gton Lake Park, n�ot through a n�e'iigh�borl'� ood. <br />51 Me'mm be'r Stroh�mme'iie'r asked for the rationale iin chant iin frontage cl�assiifiicatiion at Couin�ty Road C-2 <br />52 an�d Cle've'land Avenue from Gre'e'n�way to Flexible to address soil con�diitiion�s an�d potential <br />53, geotechnical iimmprove'mme'n�ts/costs (Se'ctiion� 2.2 of the report). <br />54 Mr. Lamm adviise'd tIl at there were faiirl significant soil con diitiion con ce'rn�s at the northwest corn e'r <br />55 ®f Couin�ty Road C-2 anId Cle've'land; anId by e'xte'n�diin the UrbanI Frontage aI®n Couin�ty Road C-2 <br />56, tIl at al�l�owe'd gre'ate'r flexibility for the buiiil�d-to l�iin�e's iin an atte'mmpt to accommodate tIl at potential <br />57 con�ce'rn . <br />58 Me'mm be'r Stroh�mme'iie'r noted tIl at the Gre'e'n�way Frontage was the mmost re'gu�l�atory of the three (3,) <br />59 frontage options; an�d q�uie'stiion e'd how mmakiin those dictates more flexible wou�l�d address soil <br />610 con�ce'rn�s. <br />611 Mr. Lamm adviise'd tIl at the corridor was still diictate'd by the Re�gu�l�atiin Map, bust iit suigge'ste'd the <br />612 Flexible Frontage on Couin�ty Road C-2 to address those soil conditions. Mr. Lamm adviise'd tII at, at <br />613, the diiscre'tiion ®f the Comm miissiion�, the area couil�d re've'rt back t® Gre�e'n�way; howe've'r, th�iis was <br />614 staff's atte'mmpt t® address the fe'e'dback from commercial property own�e'rs; anId wound still <br />615 encourage a pe'de'striian con n e'ctiion from te'd by a building as opposed to oth�e'r areas of the Lakes <br />616, Me' m�be'r Stroh�mme'iie'r q�uie'stiion�e'd the e'vol�uitiion� from the Roseville Comprehensive Plant approved iin� <br />.1 <br />617 2001 to th prop �i�s prse'd Re' guil�atiin�g Map an�d Pln <br />�a�, opi�n�iin that based on h�iis extensive research on <br />618 the timeframe to-date', the proposal for th�iis extensive zoning mmap with buiiil�d-to l�iin�e's an�d three (3,) <br />619 fronitage's. <br />70 Mr. Paschke re'spon de'd that the Comprehensive Plant diidn�"t specify what wou�l�d occuir on an�y. <br />71 prope'rty, siimmpl r gu iide'd iit irn a general se'nse'. Mr. Paschke noted tII at, wh�e'n the Comprehensive <br />72 Plan was de've'l�ope'd irn 2009, iit de'sii gn�ate'd Commmmu�n�iity/Miixe'd Use for the Twiin Lake's <br />73, Re'de've'l�opmme'n�t Are�a, fol�l�owe'd through wh�e'n the 2010 Zoning Ordinance was adopte�d, stiipuil�atiin�g <br />74 th�at a Re�gu�l�atiin�g Map be cre'ate'd to guide th�at area. Mr. Paschke n�ote�d th�at th�iis Re�gu�l�atiin Map <br />75 an�d Plan atte'mmpte'd to combine all those iin1 to one docu�mec'n�t, as well as iin�cl�u diin the Imagine <br />76, Roseville 2025 com�mmu�n�iity visioning process, an�d pre'viiouis Twiin Lake�s Re'de've'l�opmme'n�t Are'a 11 s <br />77 Urban De�sii gn Principles. <br />78 Me'mm be'r Stroh�mme'iie'r q�u�e�stiion�e'd if he coin lid be assu�re'd tIl at all environmental con�ce'rn�s were takes 'n1 <br />79 care of, or th�e'iir statu�s. <br />80 Mr. Paschke adviise'd tIl at all environmental con�ce'rn�s Mad n�ot ye't be'e'n addre'sse'd; an�d tIl at as <br />81 prope'rtiie's de've'lop, th�e' y wou�l�d be subject t® a Phase I ®r Phase 11 environmental re'viie'w, an�d if <br />82 souls were de'te'rmmiin�e'd t® ne'e'd re'mme'diiatiion�, iit wou�l�d ne'e'd to be done', siim idea` t® re'q�u�iire'mme'n�ts for <br />.1 <br />83, the Ciity, wh�e'n th�e' y h�ad done the infrastructure iimmprove'mme'n�ts for the de've'l�opmme'n�t. Mr. Paschke <br />84 n�ote'd tIl at there were dollars t® assiist those de've'l�opmme'n�ts de'pe'n�diin on the level ®f con�tammiin�atiion� <br />85 fouin�d, an�d with Ciity Council approval. <br />86, Me'mbe'r Le'ste'r referenced the June 3,0, 2011 le'tte'r from Martiin Squires, page 2, al�l�e'giin tIl at the <br />87 propose'd re' gu�l�atory structure was be'iin u�n�e'q�uial�l r, arbitrarily an�d capriiciiou�sl r appl�iie'd; an�d tIl at the <br />88 Ciity was u sirn disparate tre'atmme'n�t of own�e'rs wiith�iin the de've'l�opmme'n�t are'a. Me' m�be'r Le'ste'r soui gh�t <br />89 staff commm e'n�t on whe'the'r th�e' y h�ad con�siide're'd all prope'rty own�e'rs com�m�e'n�ts, an�d whe'the'r there <br />90 was an�y special tre'atmme'n�t. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.