|
91 Mr. Paschke advise thl at staff h�ad l�iiste'n�e'd to the con�ce'rn�s of a1I prope'rty ownee'rs partiiciipatiin in the
<br />92 variiouis diiscuissiion s, anId base'd on soiI con�diitiion�s at Couin�ty Road C-2 anId Cl�e've'l�anId Ave'nIuie', had
<br />93, atte'mmpte'd to address some of those con�ce'rn�s anId iissuie's. Mr. Paschke noted thl at some iissuie's
<br />94 anId con�ce'rn�s cou�l�d be addre'sse'd, buit oth�e'rs cou�l�d not be', buit opiinle'd thl at th�ils died not indicate
<br />95 speciaI tre'atmme'n�t. Mr. Paschke noted thl at the con�ce'rn�s of the prope'rty ownle'r at Couin�ty Road C-2
<br />96 anId Cl�e've'l�anId was con�ce'rn�e'd thl at the pre'viiouis frontage re'q�uiiire'mme'n�ts wou�l�d require them to site a
<br />97 buiiil�diinl g on a formme'r swarnp, anId the re'commmme'n�de'd re'viise'd Map anId Plan al�l�owe'd gre'ate'r
<br />98 flexibility on thl at site to realistically facilitate future de've'lop me'nt. Mr. Paschke n�ote'd thl at the entire
<br />99 area was available for potential buiiil�d ouit in th�iis re'de've'l�opm�e'n�t area, with some prope'rtiie's re'q�uiiire'd
<br />100 t® d® more remediation than oth�e'rs as the prope'rty de've'l�ope'd; howe've'r, he opiin�e'd thl at if some ®f
<br />101 those prope'rty own�e'rs were ®f the opinion thl at the Ciity was proviidiin arbitrary approval, iit was n ®t
<br />102 justified an�d was siimmpl r the e'xiistiinI g condition ®f th�e'iir partiicuil�ar prope'rty.
<br />103, Mean be'r Le'ste'r q�uie'stiion e'd who wou�l�d be responsible for de've'lop me'nt of the special corridors.
<br />A
<br />104 Mr. Paschke adviise'd th at, as part of any future de've'lop me'nt pl�ani, a de've'l�ope'r wou�l�d be requi1 red
<br />105 to dedicate that portion of th�e'iir proper ty an�d include iit as part of th�e'iir de've'l�opm�e'n�t project,
<br />106 proviidiin trail) con n e'ctiion s to Langton Lake Park to create a puck l�iic realm as sui gge'ste'd in the Plant.
<br />107 Mean be'r Le'ste'r re'q�uie'ste'd the iin�te'n�t of the corridor in Area B of the Re'gu�l�atiin Map.
<br />108 Mr. Paschke n�ote'd the re'viise'd dash�e'd line from the pre'viiouis fiixe'd l�iin�e', located over the siixty foot
<br />109 (60") wide Metropolitan Coinuin�ciil�'i s Interceptor Ease'm�e'n�t an�d how be'st to de've'lop adjace'n�t
<br />110 prope'rtiie's. Mr. Paschke n�ote'd thl at those iissuie's an�d con�ce'rn�s were re�l�ate'd to how a fiixe'd poiin�t
<br />ill iin�te'rse'ctiin with loot ia Lane an�d Moue n�t Ridge Road mar n�ot be as feasible or pru�de'n�t as one
<br />112 possibly n�e'e'de'd in a different location in order to line uip with the iinl te'rse'ctiioni, de'pe'n�diin on what
<br />113, type of de've'l�opm�e'n�t occu�rre'd at thl at l�ocatiion�.
<br />114
<br />115 Me' m�be'r Boguisze'wskii, in h m
<br />�i�s copari1 son of the June 15 DRAFT Re' guil�atiin Map an�d Plan With the
<br />116, June 3,0 DRAFT, opiin�e'd thl at iit appe'are'd the mmaj I oriity of the proposed re'viisiion�s re'cormrme'n�de'd by
<br />117 staff proviide'd less striictn�e'ss, an�d appe'are'd to address the mmajoriity of pre'viiouisl r-stated con�ce'rn�s
<br />118 of de've'l�ope'rs and /ter prope�rty own�e'rs an�d their perception of ove'rl r restrictive frontage
<br />119 re'q�uiiire'mme'n�ts. Mr. Boguisze'wskii n�ote'd thl at, iif the Plan an�d Map were approved at th�iis tiim�e',
<br />120 modifications coin lid be made in the future whe'the'r for commerciaI or residential u se', siimmiil�ar to oth�e'r
<br />121 Ciity Code arme'n�drme'n�ts for addre'ssiin specific de've'l�opm�e'n�t projects.
<br />122 Me'm�be+ r Strohim�e�ite�r, in lints re�vite�w of niu�m�e�rou�s docu�m�e�nits, expressed lints concern in the appare�nit
<br />123, lack of open space', an�d a sufficient buffer zone for Langton Lake Park; n�otiin that in h�iis re'viie'w of
<br />124 the Twin Lake�s Re'de've'l�opm�e'n�t Area, those were major con�ce'rn�s in the docu�mec'n�ts h�e' "d already
<br />125 re'fe're'n�ce'd, in addition to the AUAR. Me'rmbe'r Stroh mm e'iie'r q�u�e�stiion�e'd how the Re' guil�atiin Map
<br />126, refle'cte'd thl at an�d the efforts made to address those major con�ce'rn�s.
<br />127 Re'l�ate'd to su ffiiciie'n�t buffering for Langton Lake Park, Mr. Paschke adviise'd thl at, from staff's
<br />128 pe'rspe'ctiive', the proposed se'tbacks coin lid achieve gre'ate'r buffering arou n�d through re'q�uiiiriin�g
<br />129 certain de'diicatiion�s to provide con�n�e'ctiion�s, while n�ot atte'm�ptiin to Iii milt a prope�rty own�e'r from
<br />13,0 de've'l�opiin th�e'iir private prope�rty, which staff diidn�"t feeI was appropriate or warran�te'd.
<br />13,1 Re' gardiin open space', Mr. Paschke n�ote'd th�at th�iis its between 80-90% an Urban De�ve'l�opm�e�n�t,
<br />13,2 an�d was fairly in ke�e'pirn�g with how th�iin s have been proposed to-date in Roseville, an�d diiscu ssiion�s
<br />133 over manly years on the commmm u n�iity"s vision for the area re'late'd to se'tbacks an�d oth�e'r
<br />13,4 improvernents on private prope�rty n�ot l�iiste'd in the spe'ciifiic re'guil�atiion�s of the Re'gu�l�atiin Map an�d
<br />13,5 Plan. Mr. Paschke adviise'd thl at th�iis docu m�e'n�t was an atte'mmpt, coope'ratiive'l r with oth�e'r Ciity Code
<br />13,61 re'q�uiiire'rme'n�ts al�re'ady in place', to be cogn�iizan�t of cu�rre'n�t rmarke�t tre'n�ds for de've'l�ope'rs an�d prope�rty
<br />1 3,7 own�e'rs in the Twin Lake�s Re'de've'l�opm�e'n�t Area. Mr. Paschke n�ote'd thl at the n�u�mr e'rou�s storm
<br />
|