2011_0822_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

3 t h In addition, on July 28, , a com�m�un�ity information meeting and workshop was held for the 34 purpose of reviewing the specific projects, costs, m th�od and overall approach�. The worksh�op 35 portion (a process that has carried on to other com�m�un�ity engagement efforts) was to review 36 the step one proposal and suggest areas that may here been m�issed, areas that should not 37 be included, areas of h�igh�er priority and areas of lower priority. Included ins your packet is a bullet listing of the com�m�en�ts received at the m�eetin�g., T'h�e COT'con�tin�ues to review and 39 consider thiese comments as the process con�tin�ues. Generally, the perception is th t step one 4 ('-) is reflective of the community efforts to date., 41 42 At the August 2 nd 1 2011 Parks and Recreation Commission Meetin�g, the Commission 43 recommended that the City Council auth�orize the method, approach and dollar amount 44 ($19,025,000) as presented in the proposed step one in order to continue to fully engage the Citizen Organ�izin�g Team, Implementation Work Groups and other involved citizens ins arnest., 46 T'h�ey also recom�m�e nod ed that efforts con�tin�ue ins refin�in�g the projects as they make sense in 47 working with the com�m�un�ity, the Implementation Work Groups and to work with City Staff and 48 the City Bond Counsel to prepare a resolutions and set a public h�earin�g date., 49 As this proposal is considered, there here been discussions about how to address the need ,i for maintenance of replaced/revitalized facilities, land acquisitions and other im rovem�en�ts 2 thiat will generate increased use., ile resources for ongoing maintenance is 'e been 53 reduced in past years, it is important thiat in future budget years, as im rovem�en�ts are made, 54 that consideration be givens to provide adequate and appropriate resources based upon 55 com�m�un�ity use and expectations. The proposed plan does call for additional land acquisition as well as replacem�en�t of existing facilities and with new and im roved facilities it is fully an�ticipated thiat increased use and 59 com�m�un�ity gath�erin�gs will take place. T'h�e desire to create opportun�ities for residents to 6('-) gather and engage hies been explicitly expressed ins all plan�n�in�g efforts conducted by the City 6,i and Citizens of Roseville in�cludin�g, but not limited to, Imagine Roseville 2025, Com�preh�en�sive 62 Plan, Parks and Recreations Master Plans update and all Citizen Advisory Com�m�ission�s., 63 64 Included in your packet are the two spreadsheets from the July meeting, the first is a 65 categorical listing of step one implementation projects and costs and the other is a phiased 66 step one approach of projects and costs over 5 years., The detail project listings and 67 tim�efram�es are still being reviewed by the com�m�un�ity through the work teams and ongoing 64, com�m�un�ity dialogue which is anticipated to go on for the next couple of months with final 69 review and recom�m�en�dation�s yet to be made by the Implementation Work Groups and the "7 ('-) Parks and Recreation Com�m�ission�., At the time of final recommendation to the City Council on 7 1 the recom�m�en�ded projects, the process will con�tin�ue with setting a public h�earin�g to issue "72 bonds for th�e projects., 73 74 Jason Etten�, Chair of the COT end the Parks and Recreation Commission and staff will be at "7 the meeting for further discussion. 76 POLICY OBJECTIVE "7 "7 The process to implement the Parks and Recreation System Master Plan is consistent with City "7 goals to engage the com�m�un�ity when planning the provision of services, facilities and land use., It "7 9 is also consistent with the City's efforts as outlined in the Imagine Roseville 2025. Page 2 of 3