My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011_0822_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2011
>
2011_0822_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2012 1:34:46 PM
Creation date
12/22/2011 12:55:23 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
258
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
k" <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Date: 8-22-11 <br />Item No.: 12 b <br />City Manager Approval <br />Item Description: Consider Authorizing Approach, Method and Dollar Amount to Implement Step <br />One of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan <br />11 BAC KG U D <br />2 At the June 20th, 2011 City Council meeting, �Leisure Vision presented the �findings & the <br />3 recently conducted statistically valid interest and opinion survey. The survey reported that the <br />4, majority & residents are willing to support/invest between $8, and $10 a month (equating to <br />5 approximately $25 �- $30 million dollars for parks and recreation areas that are most important <br />6 to them. <br />"7 <br />8 At the June 20th, 2011 joint City Council/Parks and Recreation Commission meeting there was <br />9 a discussion on how to move forward with implementation & the recently adopted system <br />110 master plan in relation to the survey while considering other City Capital Improvement needs. <br />11 Taking the survey and other Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) needs into consideration, the <br />12 City Council asked the Citizen Organizing Team (COT) and the Parks and Recreation <br />13 Commission to recommend a funding and implementation approach. <br />14, <br />15 At the July 11th, 2011 City Council meeting there was a review and discussion on the <br />116 proposed possible approaches, 'financing methods, time based full implementation and <br />1 7 specific project and costs for step one implementation. At this meeting there appeared to be a <br />11 111"":1'11 general consensus that the preferred approach at this time was to focus primarily on existing <br />119 parks and facilities with the exception & time sensitive land acquisitions and to utilize a City <br />20 Council approved abatement bond funding method. Further work would include sharing the <br />2 1 specifics & the proposed plan with the community to gain additional �feedback and to consider <br />22 refinements as suggested by the community and the Implementation Groups and to eventually <br />23 return back to the City Council with a resolution setting a public hearing date. <br />24, <br />25 Since �formulating proposed step one; the COT, Parks and Recreation Commission, <br />26 Implementation Work Groups and staff have been sharing the specifics & the proposal with <br />27 the community. Specifically, there have been 13 constellation tour occasions in various <br />28 neighborhoods throughout the community. They have been very well attended with average <br />29 attendance & 100 per neighborhood. The overall proposal has been well received. By the <br />30 time & your meeting on August 22 nd 7 there will be 2 additional neighborhood gatherings which <br />3 1 will complete the entire tour of the 15 Constellations. <br />32 <br />Page I of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.