My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2011_1121
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
CC_Minutes_2011_1121
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2011 12:53:55 PM
Creation date
12/27/2011 12:53:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/21/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,November 21, 2011 <br /> Page 27 <br /> tioned whether the community could sustain the goals of the CIP Task Force and <br /> all the other impacts. <br /> Mayor Roe opined that the alternative was to do nothing. <br /> Councilmember Pust responded that everything was not black and white; and <br /> while she understood the rationale in not phasing it in, she spoke in support of <br /> phasing the cumulative package. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that this was one perspective; and opined that the public would <br /> provide their input as well; and this was the rationale in the CIP Task Force <br /> providing the information to the public early on in the process, in June of 2011. <br /> Along those same lines as addressed by Councilmember Pust, Councilmember <br /> McGehee reiterated her previous calculations on impacts of loss of homestead <br /> credit; increased utility fees; and her preference to have seen different versions for <br /> consideration. Councilmember McGehee noted past discussion on conservation <br /> tiered systems for water rates; noting that the City's rates currently reflected the <br /> highest base rates in the metropolitan area; and expressed her shock at the pro- <br /> posed rate increases. When considering the utility rate increases proposed to ad- <br /> dress infrastructure CIP needs, the bond interest for the fire station and parks im- <br /> provements, reductions in homestead credit, and other factors, Councilmember <br /> McGehee opined that this represented almost a 70% increase in people's taxes in <br /> 2014; and she wondered what the Council majority was thinking. <br /> Councilmember McGehee asked Mr. Miller to evaluate a tiered water system, <br /> based on conservation use; and to explain why seniors were proposed for a 40% <br /> increase and commercial properties only a 21%increase. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that, as an example, seniors would get a 40% increase on a total <br /> rate of$66.00; and commercial properties had significantly higher base rates than <br /> residential users. Mayor Roe noted the need to look at dollar impacts, not just <br /> percentages. <br /> Mayor Roe advised that conservation water rates would be taken up at later time, <br /> as it had been included in previous discussion for the City Council's 2012 work <br /> plan. <br /> Councilmember Willmus, for his own understanding and not necessarily from a <br /> certain point of view, noted Councilmember Pust's comments on 2012 property <br /> tax statements for 2011 payable taxes; and provided his personal impact with a <br /> 1.4%overall increase. Councilmember Willmus noted the variables among prop- <br /> erties. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.