Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, December 05,2011 <br /> Page 2 <br /> Mayor Roe noted that the Closed Executive Session portion of tonight's meeting had <br /> been recessed, and due to a lack of time to complete discussions, the Closed Executive <br /> Session continued to December 12, 2011 to conclude that discussion. <br /> Staff Presentation <br /> Mayor Roe introduced Finance Director Chris Miller for an overview of the 2012 Budget <br /> and 2012 Utility Rate Reviews. <br /> Finance Director Miller noted that this year's presentation would encompass a considera- <br /> ble amount of information; and the unusual aspects of the upcoming 2012 budget year. <br /> Mr. Miller noted his review topics would include a budget chronology; budget impact <br /> items; budget summary; property tax levy impact; local tax rate comparisons; and utility <br /> rate impact. <br /> Councilmember McGehee directed Roseville residents to the City of Shoreview's website <br /> to find a useful chart among their budget materials on the topic of the Market Value <br /> Homestead Credit(MVHC). <br /> At the conclusion of Finance Director Miller's presentation, Mayor Roe thanked Mr. Mil- <br /> ler for providing a background on the budget and utility rate process; and noted that later <br /> in tonight's agenda, as well as at the December 12, 2011 meeting if necessary, and fol- <br /> lowing additional City Council discussions, formal budget and utility rate actions would <br /> be taken. <br /> 2012 Budget and Utility Rates Hearing <br /> Mayor Roe opened the Public Hearing at approximately 7:05 p.m. for the purpose of <br /> hearing public comment on the proposed 2012 Budget and Utility Rates; and briefly re- <br /> viewed public hearing procedures and protocol for the City Council to receive public tes- <br /> timony. Mayor Roe noted that all testimony would be heard prior to responses from staff <br /> or Councilmembers, and if necessary those responses may be delayed to a future meeting <br /> to allow further research as indicated. <br /> Public Comment <br /> Dan Cartier,2917 Hillsview Avenue E <br /> Related to the shortfall in the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP), Mr. Cartier <br /> questioned how the projected annual need over the next twenty (20) years had been de- <br /> termined, whether internally or through the use of an outside engineering study. Mr. Car- <br /> tier expressed concern that the projected needs in dollar amount suddenly appeared and it <br /> seemed the logical solution was to address that shortage through the pocketbooks of resi- <br /> dents; and questioned the validity of the projected financial need. <br /> Jessica Anderson 555 Shryer Avenue W <br /> Ms. Anderson noted that, as someone carefully planning for their own household budg- <br /> ets, it was hard for her to understand how such a significant shortfall could have oc- <br /> curred, when residents trusted their elected officials to manage the City's business. Ms. <br />