Laserfiche WebLink
C`31 3 6. 0 RECOMMENDATIONS <br />64 6.1 Community Development staff concurs with the recommendation of the Planning <br />6 "'1 Commission to exclude the following applications from open house requirements: <br />66 a. Conditional Use Permits - because conditional uses are already recognized by the <br />67 City Code as acceptable so long as certain criteria are met; <br />6 b. Plats and Subdivisions - since the division of land is a fundamental right of a <br />69 property owner and the City Code already prohibits divisions of property that fail to <br />'7 comply with existing standards; <br />'7 1 c. Zoning Text Amendments - while the uses allowed on a property would change, they <br />'7 2 would still have to be consistent with the purpose and intent of the existing zoning <br />'7 3 district; <br />'7 4 d. Vacations of Public Easements or Rights-of-Way - since a vacation request <br />'7 1 represents a "returning" of land to the property from which it was dedicated and may <br />'7 6 only be approved with the Public Works Director's determination that maintenance of <br />77 the easement or right-of-way is no longer in the public interest; and <br />7f',,,`,',`3 e. Variances - although variances represent a departure from the strict application of the <br />'7 9 Code, they only apply to the site requirements and may not introduce uses on to a <br />property that are not allowed by the applicable zoning district. <br />ii 6.2 Based on the suggestions and input offered at the public hearing, the Planning <br />Commission recommends requiring community open house meetings for the following <br />land use applications: <br />a. Comprehensive Plan Amendments - these represent what are perhaps the most <br />fundamental changes in the land use regulations on a property; <br />6 b. ezonings -while the uses permitted by a different zoning district may be consistent <br />with the guidance of the Comprehensive Plan, they may be dramatically different <br />f111­3f111"",1'3 from what has historically been allowed on a property; <br />9 c. Planned Unit Developments (both new and amended) - since site and use <br />9(1) requirements are relaxed in exchange for a higher quality of development; and <br />9 1 d. Interim Use Permits - because the proposed use is explicitly not permitted by the <br />92 Zoning Ordinance nor supported by the Comprehensive Plan land use designation. <br />93 6.3 Because the City Code regulates these different applications in separate chapters and <br />94 sections, the proposed TEXT AMENDMENT includes the following elements as <br />9 t � <br />) requirements in each of the sections relevant to Planned Unit Developments (§1008.10)9 <br />96 rezonings (Ch. 101 ) , and interim uses ( §1013.0 ) : <br />97 a. After reviewing the proposal with the Community Development Director or designee <br />9 and prior to submitting an application, an applicant shall hold a meeting with <br />99 members of the community (i.e., an "open. house") to describe the proposal and soli. i.t <br />ii ii feedback. <br />b The applicant shall prepare a printed open house notification/invitation and mail it to <br />1 2 property owners within 500 feet of the project property as well as members of the <br />1 3 Planning Commission and City Council; Community Development staff will provide <br />PROJOO I O—PUD-Open-House—RCA-032408.doc <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />