|
Attachment F
<br />:J W."I'Ll I'Ll I I'Ll lei J I I =91110111114 I �
<br />2,
<br />Request by Ted Glasrud Associates, Inc. t ©r approval ©t an INTERIM USE PERMIT
<br />3
<br />(IUP) t© all ©w constructi ©n ©t an accessory structure at Rosedale Tower, 1700
<br />,4,
<br />Highway 3,6
<br />5
<br />Ch�aiir Bake'm�an� ope'ne'd the Puibl�iic Hearing for Planning File 08-041.
<br />6
<br />Associate Pl�an�n�e'r Bryan Lloyd re'viie'we'd staff; s anal rsiis of the re'q�uie'st of Ted Gl�asruid
<br />7'
<br />Associates, In�c. to allow con struictiion of a gaze'bo at the Rosedale Tower office buiiil�diin�g
<br />8
<br />at 1700 Highway 3, 6.
<br />9
<br />Mr. Lloyd adviise'd that th�iis accessory structure was proposed to con�struict a ten foot by
<br />10
<br />20 foot (10 11 x 20") gaze'bo to provide a sh�e'l�te'r for visitors and e'rmpl�oye'e's takiin bre'aks
<br />11
<br />somewhere be'yon�d the mmaiin entrance of the office buiiil�diin . Mr. Lloyd re'viie'we'd potential
<br />12,
<br />locations, and proposed site (Locatiion B) fol�l�owiin cormrme'n�ts from adjoining prope'rty
<br />13
<br />own�e'rs re'ce'iive'd at the appl�iican�t"s informational rme'e'tiin with those prope'rty own�e'rs.
<br />14
<br />Mr. Lloyd adviise'd that the n�e'iigh�bors appe'are'd to be ge'n�e'ral�l r suipportiive', n�otiin that the
<br />15
<br />applicant head done substantive and good work re'h�abiil�iitatiin the prope'rty and addiin�g
<br />16
<br />value since th�e'y 11 ve mman�age'd the prope'rty. Mr. Lloyd n�ote'd that, duiriin the informational
<br />1 7'
<br />rme'e'tiin s h�e'l�d by the applicant, the n�e'iigh�bors were n�ot oppose�d to the gaze'bo, but head
<br />18
<br />e' xpre'sse'd concem with sm oke'rs uisiimg iit and be'iin�g r�e'ar t�e'iir windows iim the adjace'n�t
<br />19
<br />condos. Mr. Lloyd adviise'd that, due to the close proximity to adjace'n�t buiiil�diings and as a
<br />2,0
<br />measure to addre'ss that cony ce'rn�, staff wou�l�d n�orm�al�l r re'com�m�e'n�de'd a scre'e'n�iing fence
<br />2,1
<br />and /or landscaping to buffer residential prope'rty n�e'arby. Mr. Lloyd adviise'd that there was
<br />2,2,
<br />al�re'ady iinl place a privacy fence and mature tre'e's; and that the're'fore', staff was not
<br />2,3
<br />re'com�m�e'n�diing any additional pe'rm an�e'n�t buffers. Mr. Lloyd note'd that staff was
<br />24
<br />re'com�m�e'n�diing a cony diitiion re'late'd to trash re'ce'ptacl�e's to addre'ss an�oth�e'r concem
<br />2,5
<br />mme'n�tiion�e'd by n�e'iigh�bors.
<br />2,6
<br />Staff re'cormrme'n�de'd APPROVAL of the re'q�uie'ste'd INTERIM USE PERMIT, as ou�tl�iin�e'd iin�
<br />2, '
<br />Sections 5 and 6, and the conditions de'taine'd iin Se'ctiion 7 of the project report dated
<br />2,8
<br />Nove'mmbe'r 5, 2008.
<br />2,9
<br />Diiscuissiion iin�cl�uide'd differentials for de'cks and accessory struictuire's iin� bu siin�e'ss ve'rsu�s
<br />30
<br />residential are'as.
<br />31
<br />Applicant, Tim McCarthy, f ©r applicant
<br />32,
<br />Mr. McCarthy addre'sse'd the exact model ®t gaze'bo be'iinl g proposed; h�an�diicappe'd
<br />33
<br />accessibility; iits diire'ct access t® the buiiil�diin t ®r use by buiiil�diin te'n�an�ts and visitors;
<br />34
<br />accormrmodatiion ®t smmoke'rs and providing sh�e'l�te'r; high wiin�ds iinI the area ®t Rosedale
<br />35
<br />Towers; buiiil�diin hours ®t approxiimmate'l 6:00 a.mm. t® 6:00 p.mm.; con�ce'rn�s ®t n�e'iighIbors
<br />36
<br />that the gaze'bo may become a gath�e'riin place after h�ou�rs; and the appl�iican�t"s due
<br />3 7'
<br />diligence and cuirre'n�t buiiil�diinl g maintenance and se'cuiriity iin place'. Mr. McCarthy adviise'd
<br />38
<br />that there head be'e' n probl�e'rms iin the past, priior t® th�e�iir takiin over own�e'rsh�iip and
<br />39
<br />rman�age'rme'n�t ®t the buiiil�diinl g and sine'; Howe've'r, he n�ote'd that these iissuie's h�ad been
<br />40
<br />al�l�e'viiate'd, much t® the appre'ciiatiion ®t the n�e'ii gHborh�ood.
<br />41
<br />Mr. McCarthy expre'sse'd Hies agre'e'rme'n�t with all conditions as re'cormrme'n�de'd by staff; and
<br />42,
<br />wiil�l�iin n�e'ss t® work with staff th�roui gh�ouit the process.
<br />43 Ch�aiir Bakecmr an closed the PuIbl�ilc He'ariin , with n�o one appe'ariin t® speak.
<br />44, MOTION
<br />45 Member Doherty moved, seconded by Member Martins ©n to RECOMMEND
<br />46 APPROVAL, ©t an INTERIM USE PERMIT to all ©w construction ©t an accessory
<br />4`7 structure at Rosedale Tower, 1700 Highway 3,6, by Ted Glasrud Associates, Inc.;
<br />48 based on the comments and findings outlined in Sections 5 and 6, and the
<br />49 conditions detailed in Secti ©n 7 ©t the project report dated November 05, 200 .
<br />50 Commissioner Wozn�iiak opiin�e'd thiat, as a te'nan�t at an�otHe'r buiill�diin m�an�age'd by the
<br />51 same company, he cou�l�d atte'st tHat tHe'iir maintenance staff are ouit e've'ry m ormiir�g
<br />52, pre'pariin�g the grouin�ds; and thiat, iin ge'n�e'ral�, tHe' y died a good job taking care ®t tHe'iir
<br />53 buiiIl�diIn�gs and te'nan�ts.
<br />54 Ayes: 6
<br />55 Nays: 0
<br />1, r4Ttr4r1W;1-=,.- f 11
<br />
|