My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008_1013_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2008
>
2008_1013_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2012 1:34:48 PM
Creation date
12/28/2011 11:52:14 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
277
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Additional discussion included frequency of transit vehicles; inclusion of <br />circulator , commuter , or other transit options based on demand; capacity <br />I <br />of 500 anticipated by 2030; and encouraging the applicant to consider van <br />or car pooling for handicap uses. <br />Public Comment <br />Tam McGehee, 77 Mid Oaks Lane <br />Ms. McGehee asked that the applicant consider some type of deterrent for <br />the glass tower to avoid injury to migratory birds using that flight plan. <br />Ms. McGehee spoke in support of the proposed aesthetics of the plan. <br />Mr. Jones advised that they would look into that issue to see if something <br />could be recommended to address it having not considered it before nor <br />analyzed it from a design standpoint. <br />Chair Bakeman closed the Public Hearing. <br />Further discussion included timing for funding of Mount Ridge Road, and <br />was addressed by Community Development Director Patrick Trudgeon, <br />based on City Council authorization. <br />Iii <br />Member Doherty moved, seconded by Member B,akeman to <br />RECOMMEND APPROVAL of the REZONING of Lot 1, Block 1, <br />Twin Lakes Addition from 1-2, General Industrial District, to PUD, <br />Planned Unit Development, with an underlying zoning of B,-�6, Mixed <br />Use Business Park District; based on the comments and findings as <br />detailed in the project report dated October 1, 20080 <br />BM <br />Nays: I (B,oerigter) <br />Motion carried. <br />iff 0-1 11 <br />Member Doherty moved, seconded by Member B,akeman to <br />RECOMMEND APPROVAL of the GENERAL CONCEPT PUD as <br />prepared for the October 1, 2008 Planning Commission meeting by <br />Metro Transit, subject to the conditions of Section 7 of the project <br />report dated October 1, 2008; with final approval by the City Council <br />to be considered after all conditions and required documents and <br />permits have been submitted for final approval, considered as a <br />separate application process. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.