2008_1013_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. Goedeke stated that the vote is important since some things have been in�clulded in the chapter that somie SC members don't sulpport. He has concerned aboult specific issules that have in�clulded in chapters previoulsly approved by the SC, such as the three (3,) proposed bulsin�ess categories. He expressed his opposition to this approach to the City's bulsin�ess land ulna categories. Grefen�berg stated that the SC has achieved a remarkable am�ouln�t of con�sen�suls on most chapters. He believes that the oultstan�din�g issules have been identified for the SC to address at tonight's meeting. Another option wound be for the SC to decide to not make a recommendation and he wound like to keep this option open . Fifield reminded the groulp that tonight's meeting is the final SC meeting. It is necessary to get the SC's recommendation on the draft ulpdated Comp Plan that will be forwarded to the Planning Commission (PC) and City Couln�cil (CC). Doherty stated that it is not fair to send it to the PC with�oult some sort of recommendation. The PC wound benefit from some direction from the SC. He feels that the SC needs to vote on the oultstan�din�g issules. Goedeke agreed that the SC sh�oulld take a vote on each of the oultstan�din�g qulestion�s. Grefen�berg distribulted a h�an�doult (Attachment C) regarding his concerns aboult implementation strategies that he feels have been left oust of the Implementation Chapter. Bakernan expressed her frustration with the frequlen�t occulrren�ce of written memos being handed oust at SC meetings by in�dividulal SC members. When this happens, the SC didn't have adequlate time to review the h�an�doults dulrin�g the meeting and then vote on approving the sulggested changes to the in�dividulal chapters. She stated that Grefen�berg's h�an�doult at tonight's meeting regarding implementation strategies was an example of this situlation�. Grefen�berg responded that his h�an�doult was identical to his h�an�doult at the Aulgulst 14�h SC meeting. His position is that all implementation strategies in the in�dividulal chapters sh�oulld be in�clulded in the Implementation chapter. Fifield asked whether there sh�oulld be more action steps than are culrren�tly shown in the draft plan tonight. If so, they can be added dulrin�g the six-month review process. He then asked whether the Implementation chapter sh�oulld show all of the implementation references in the in�dividulal chapters of the plan, essentially dulplicatin�g them. SC con�sen�suls is that all implementation strategies within the in�dividulal chapters sh�oulld go into the Implementation chapter. Based on the SC responses to the master plan policy sulrvey in Aulgulst, the SC achieved con�sen�suls on not in�cluldin�g park plans and in�frastrulctulre plans in the Comp Plan. The qulestion�s aboult the relationship of master plans to the Comp Plan are focused on small area plans.