2008_0825_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

not Cleveland Avenue. 8.4 The Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area does, not rely on a regional storm water management system. Each site redevelopment, or a, combination thereof, would be required to create and manage its own storm water according to City Code and, the Rice Creek Watershed. Here too, efficiencies and better utilization of the land can be achieved 0, if considerat i ion. s given to a broader redevelopment area and plan. The remaining utilities, such as electricity, cable, telephone, and natural gas, will be designed and coordinated through the Public, Works, Department to be underground, and Utilize. a joint trenching systern, where applicable. 8.6 Staff is recommending that the proposed, access road be privately constructed to the City's design standards and subsequently dedicated to the City. The recommendation is I that the road width be 2,4 ' except that portion west of"the cooperative's parking lot, where the road would expand to 32' in. width in order to accommodate limited on-street parking. 8.7 A traffic analysis of the site was conducted. by a registered Professional Engineer (P.E.). This analysis. (attached) concludes that approximately 1, 60 vehicles will. enter and exit the site each day with no more than 6 vehicles entering or exiting the development during either the a.m.. or p.m. peak traffic hours. The City Engineer has concluded that the existing public road system is more than adequate for absorbing this level of traffic. 9�.0 PARK LAND 91.1 Because the property is required to be 4'replatted.," park dedication may be required ico n s 1 stei, tit w ith State S ta tute s 46 23 5 8 an d, § 1. 10 3.0 7 o f the Ro s e v i I te C i ty C ode. 101.10 �STAFF COMMENTS-. 10. 1 On March 6, 2007, the Parks and Recreation Cornmission discussed the application (see attached minutes), While the Commission did. not make any -formal recommendation to either Support, or oppose the plan, they did stresis, their position that any development in this area adhere to the Langton Lake Park Master Plan, The Parks and Recreation. Commission revisited the issue at. their May I meeting, but took- no further action at that meeting. It is anticipated that the Parks and Recreation Con-Imiss- 101i will review the Current site plan at their upcoming meeting on June 5. considered two earlier iterations of this 10.2 On March '7, 2007 the Planning Commission consi application. The general consensus of the Planning Commission at that time was that the proposed use was acceptable, but that a solution to park access would be necessary before their final consideration. 1 .3 On March 28, 2007 the Development Review Committee (DRQ met to review the proposal submitted by United Properties. The DRC concluded that in. "concept" the submittal, to redevelop the subject property into an age - restricted cooperative housing development is appropriate and not inconsistent with the Roseville Comprehensive Lane PF07-006 RCA 061807 Page 6 of 9