2008_0915_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

5.4 The remaining land area will be dedicated as public right-of-way for Langton Lake Drive. 59 5.5 There are no minimum lot size standards within the B-6,, Business District zone. However,, lot 60 sizes and shape are usually dictated by the type of use or structure size,, the required on-site 6 1 parking field, and any required setbacks. 62 5.6 Utility and drainage easements are necessary. Specifically these 12 foot wide easements shall 63 be provided adjacent the south property line of both Lot I and Lot 2; shall be provided adjacent 64 the east property line of Lot 2; and adjacent to Cleveland Avenue (both. lots). Further, a 65 minimum 12 foot wide easement shall be provided adjacent to the west side of the interior lot 66 line of Lot I and Lot 2 (over the trail as depicted on the sit plat), for maintenance vehicle access 67 to the City's storm water outlet. All easements shall be approved by the Public Works Director 68 prior to the filing of the plat with Ramsey County. 40 b"Mill W 0 "A 0 "7 6.1 The Roseville Public Works/Engineering and Community Development Departments,, 7 recommend approval of the proposed 2-lot subdivision with public road right-of-way dedication "72 as submitted by United Properties. This subdivision shall be conditioned on the following.- "7 3 a. Utility and drainage easement being provided as stated in Section 5.7 or as approved by "74 the Public Works Director. "7 b. The Preliminary/Final Plat may require park dedication for Lot 2, Block 1, consistent "7 6 with State Statutes 4�62.358 and § 1103.07 of the Roseville City Code. The applicant "7 "7 shall work with the Park and Recreation Department on determining whether such a "7 dedication or payment in lieu of land dedication is required. Said recommendation shall "7 9 be forwarded to the City Council during the Final Development PUD process. 8o 7.0 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: 7.1 On September 3, 2008, the Roseville Planning held the duly noticed public hearing for the preliminary plat. No citizens were present to address the Commission, but the Commission did 3 have a few questions of Staff. 84 7.2 Commissioner Boerigter asked the question of why the City does not require an Outlot for the area that encompasses the road right-of-way versus dedication as right-of-way on the plat. His 11, 6 interest was centered on land located north of the road in the northwest comer of the parcel that "7 encompasses the wetland. His position was that this would be an appropriate area for gateway signage and landscaping consistent with the Twin lakes Urban Design Principles and that it 1 9 would not be the City's responsibility to maintain. The City Planner commented that the policy 90 is to require dedication of right-of-way on subdivision plats and that the subject area was 9111 supported by the Public Works Department and that most of the area would remain natural and 92 the existing trees preserved. 93 7.3 The September 3, 2008, Planning Commission minutes were unavailable at the printing of the 94 project report. However, the Planning Commission voted (7-0), to recommend approval of the 95 PRELIMINARY PLAT. Page 3 of 4