2008_0915_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

114 side property line should the office and adjacent shopping center properties no longer be 115 owned by one entity; because this goal will be achieved by the revised proposal without 116 recording additional documentation,, the current recommendation will not include such a 11 7' requirement. 118 6.8 Condition "e"' of the GENERAL CONCEPT approval was recommended in order to ensure 119 that enough parking was available to accommodate the additional parking demand on the 12,0 days when employee training sessions are held in the proposed office expansion without 12,1 excessive on-street parking. This condition hinged on the initial willingness of the 12,2, Roseville Covenant Church to enter into a formal parking arrangement,, but the church 1 2, 3 has since decided that encumbering its property with an easement is not in its best 124 interest. Although the City cannot prohibit parking on a public street where parking is 12,5 allowed it will be incumbent upon Presbyterian Homes to minimize the overflow; this 12,6 may be accomplished by such means as encouraging ride-sharing among visitors to the 12,"'7 site and/or maintaining informal, cooperative relationships with nearby property owners 12,8 with parking areas that can absorb overflow parking during typical office hours. Because 12,9 Planning Division staff believes that requiring the applicant to enter into a formal 130 agreement with an unwilling third party would not be reasonable, such condition will be 131 eliminated from the recommendation. 132, 7.0 OTHER COMMENTS 133 7.1 A permit from the Rice Creek Watershed District will be necessary, but this is part of the 134 normal course of site permitting and the FINAL PUD may be approved without the 135 inclusion of these technical details. 136 7.2 No members of the public have contacted staff with concerns or comments about the 13 7' proposal. 138 7.3 Although indicated on the proposed site plans, signage on the property i