Laserfiche WebLink
A. <br />3 <br />4 <br />6 <br />7 <br />9 <br />1.0 <br />11 <br />12 <br />1.3 <br />15 <br />1.6 <br />�7 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />1-3 <br />2? 6 <br />2'7 <br />-)8 <br />29 <br />0 <br />4 <br />5 <br />_36 <br />9 <br />40 <br />41, <br />42 <br />4-3 <br />44 <br />45 <br />a, -f i C I adds a sidt-.walk, There, are threr- lots whC,.re 2 fi�p,,A of -o <br />o.-f'- a, w.i. -11. neec:t L <br />purch�asedl to con.struct,the sid-elwalk- <br />4 <br />Can. 'Ehe concepts 'be changed? How mutcc-h -flexibility is there with development proposals <br />fi <br />that co me forward -in U lle Lure? <br />The drawings as shown in the report are concepts only, Ith-ey will need additional des ignto <br />come up with the final construction drawing. It- is not anticipated -that these projects will.] <br />occur without a public process, It is Public Works Department Pollcy to go through a pub.tic <br />infon-naLion process for all. con.str-uction. projects, this usually consists of 2 or 3 public <br />meetings prior to the project being corlstructed. It is also ea red that these inaprovenients <br />will not all happen. immediately, They would only occur when the traffic bema aei:i.erc-ited- <br />.11 Z�� tD <br />by a development proposal diminishes the level of service for the Identified segments of the <br />roadway network, <br />R <br />The intent of the Study was to C"'Ietern-ii.ne the cost nvIement the infrastructure <br />i t T <br />improvement-s i-deg. ti-fied In the Mitigation Plan show on. pages 59-65 of the A JAR., This <br />I � I <br />mitioration. plan. -is the City's commitment to address potential adverse environment-al. impacts <br />due to the development in the Twin Lakes AU AR area. The you of the im:pro vements: <br />(i-e. the number of lanes, length. of turn lanes, additional signals, etc.) are consistent with. the <br />rnitigation. plan approved by the City Council.. in the AUAR. <br />Can. the costs be assessed or assigned down the line"? A. PUD ag-Treement will be exeCUt-ed fior <br />all. parcels impacted by the Report. If TIF is requested., there will also be a deg -elop .en,[ <br />acrreement iffir each. proposal. Staff anticipates -hat the manner of collectmg 'L-he costs 1.0 <br />irnphnMent -L--h.e mitigation. plan. would be described as a condition of these agreements, <br />flect them. as <br />Options are to collect them up front, or cot projects are constructed. <br />Could we develop a policv frarnework document that would detail the imp I-C-..,mentation of the <br />Study? Staff air s that this should be developed to help clarify how the study wi.11 be <br />applied. as developments come in. <br />We will bring this study back to the City Council C-it. the February 25, 2008 Co-uncd meetimy <br />Please let me no w if you have an questions or require addItional in-formation. <br />