My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008_0303_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2008
>
2008_0303_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2012 1:34:50 PM
Creation date
12/28/2011 3:24:50 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
179
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LJI� <br />Councilmember Pust concurred with (Zouncilmember Roe's recollectl0r1l, <br />opining that her recollections indicated that the advisory groups <br />recommendation called for a two (2) year data gatheHng opportunity <br />prior to taking the enforcement step, <br />Further discussion included registration vversus licensing programs; <br />whether to consider multi-family reIntals be!wnd smaller unit rentals; <br />inspection considerations and issues; identifying smaller rental units; <br />and whether to remove enforcement issues from the proposed <br />ordinance to allow for data gathering and monitoring. <br />Don Munson I I <br />,f City of Roseville Building Official <br />Mr. Munson advised that a large problem was in overcrowding, and the <br />need for staff to access interiors to determine any health and safety <br />It was Council consensus that staff return with a more refined and <br />edited version for a rental property registration ordinance, excluding <br />code enforcement issues. However, staff was requested to keep those <br />code enforcement revisions for later Council consideration. <br />Councilmember Kough expressed concern that single-family hom�s <br />used for student housing based on economics be addressed <br />immediately, citing pCarking and refuse problems and neighborhood <br />concerns. <br />Coun1c.-JImember Punt noted that the recently-endorsed Uniform <br />Building Code was passed after presentation of 'the citizen advisory <br />group report, and needed to be reflected in any proposed ordinance. <br />!11 IN <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.