2008_0225_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Draft Planning Commission Minutes Attachment D PLANNING FILE 08-004 Request by Snelling Liquor for a CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT to allow an off-sale liquor store in 3 the existing building at 221�7 Snelling Avenue Chair Bakernan opened the Public Hearing for Planning File 08-004. 5 Mr. Lloyd reviewed the request of Steve Allen, in conjunction with property owners Clifford and Marylin 6 Snyde'r for approval of a CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) to allow a 1,800 square foot, off-sale liquor 7 store, d/b/a Snelling Liquor, in the existing building at 221�7 Snelling Avenue. 8 Mr. Lloyd noted the different City Code definitions and requirements for stand-alone versus those liquor C/', stores located within a shopping ce'nte'r building; and briefly reviewed applicable CUP crite'ria, or 10 proposed conditions of approval. "I'll Staff recommended APPROVAL of the CUP for Steve Allen for a proposed off -sale liquor store at 221�7 I r ?, Snelling Avenue, to operate in compliance with requirements and regulations established in Roseville City 13 Code, Section 1004-01G; and based on comments and findings of Sections 5 and 6 of the project report 1 dated February 6, 2008. City Code, Section 302, related to operations of a liquor store was referenced by 15 staff. 16 Commissioner Gasongo noted the re'ce'ntly-approve'd application for the apartment building improvements 17 to the north, and questioned the impact of this land use on those neighborhood improvements and market 1 values. 1 Mr. Lloyd advised that this improvement would eliminate vacant space', and had not be'e'n reviewed for (1210 impacts to market value of adjoining prope'rtie's, as beyond the scope of the land use conside'ration, with "I", r I this use recognized as compatible in the Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Boerigter questioned whether the Commission was to consider City Code Section 302-02 302.13d, or if those were for the City Council's conside'ration in issuing a liquor lice'nse'. Mr. Lloyd advised that the Code Section was included only for informational purposes for the Commission 4-1 "1"?15 to be aware of off-sale liquor store operations, and that staff was not indicating any additional conditions '21 to this use for Commission application. !1- 7 Discussion included xt rior elevations of the building and the desire of the Commission for (1`N11`. ""11'111 iimprove'me'nts; future sign pe'rmit as pe'r code' ; additional landscaping ame'nitie's; fe'ncing be'twe'e'n the subject and neighboring residential property as per code requirement; softening the impact to adjacent 30 prope'rtie's through additional gre'e'n space or scre'e'ning; and limitations to site conditions based on inside 3 "1 activities related to the CUP. 31"1"?, Additional discussion included communication with ne'ighbors to-date', with Mr. Lloyd advising he had 33 receive one (1 phone call from the residential property owner on the west, concerned with loitering of 3,`,1 clientele using the facility, indicating that more residents of the building shared those concerns. Howe've'r, 35 Mr. Lloyd advised that staff had re'ce'ive'd no othe'r communications to-date', with the exception of a query 36 from a resident se'e'king how to contact the Planning Commission, and how to receive additional 37 information on the application. 38 Commissioners Boe'rigte'r and Wozniak advised that they had re'ce'ive'd se've'ral e' -mail objections to the proposal, based on perceived negative impacts of liquor store activities. ,,,`,10 Staff noted that the applicant was not present. 1 Public Comment Deedee Goodwin, 2206 Haddington Road ,13 Ms. Goodwin re'fe're'nce'd Section 6.6 of the staff report re'late'd to the project's impact on the ge'ne'ral public health, safety and welfare; and addressed the project's proximity to parks, specifically Brimhall 15 School and Evergreen Park. Ms. Goodwin challenged the staff re port's statement that the site was ov r 1/2 16 mile from the school and park; and opined that the liquor store would have a detrimental impact on the ,17 neighborhood that was already experiencing a serious drug problem. Ms. Goodwin addressed her work history in corrections; ATF activity in the Haddington Road area in the past; and impacts to the neiighborhood from the recently-enlarged Target store and historical patterns of crime following big box 5c) retail ce'nte'rs. Ms. Goodwin asked that the Commission conside'r the affects of a liquor store on the