2008_0225_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

g�:,' " 111") 1 residential quality of life issues and the increased crime in the neighborhood (i.e�., increased foot traffic, 51"1"?, more police calls at bus stops, incre'ase'd graffiti, incre'ase'd trash and litte'ring), and future incre'ase's in 53 re'side'ntial prope'rty de'nsitie's due to additional re'ntal units (i.e'., Har Mar Apartment improve'me'nts and 5,,,`,l construction of additional units). Ms. Goodwin opine'd that, from a pe'rsonal and profe'ssional position, by 55 putting liquor store in that location, it would only be incre'asing proble'ms. 56 Randy Ne'prash, 1276 Eldridge Avenue 57 Mr. Ne'prash asked that, while conside'ring this application, the Commission could resolve anothe'r traffic 58 issue in the area, to eliminate one of the driveways into the shopping strip. Mr. Ne'prash advise'd that the miinimal traffic island in between the two driveways did little to enhance traffic flow, and actually confused 60 traffic. Mr. Neprash suggested striping the lot more effectively, at a minimum, to be'tte'r define the two 6 "1 areas. 61"1"?, Chair Bakernan closed the Public Hearing. 63 Additional discussion among staff and Commissioners include'd distance re'quire'me'nts for lice'nsing the 6`l sit , of which staff advised there were none under current City Code, and therefore had not received 65 conside'ration during staffs re'vie�w of the CUP; and background checks of the applicant prior to lice'nsure'. 66 MOTION 67 Mernber Doherty moved, seconded by Mernber Gasongo to RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A 68 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT for Steve Allen for a proposed Off -sale liquor store at 221�7 Snelling Avenue, to operate in compliance with requirements and regulations established in Roseville City 70 Code, Sections 1004-01G; and based on comments and findings of Sections 5 and 6 of the project 7 1 report dated February 6, 2008. 7 11 It was the consensus of Commissioners that the land use fit within the CUP category; and noted that, at '73 the City Council level, the we'll-researched background investigations by the Police Department would Tl facilitate a review of this applicant's history in operating other faciliti s (i. ., a store in Minneapolis) for '75 other non-land use concerns. '76 Aye's: 6 77 Nays: 1 (Gottfried) 78 Motion carried. 7()' Chair Bakernan advised that the Case was scheduled to be heard by the City Council at its February 25, 8c) 2008 meeting. 9��