2008_0225_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

1 5.5 The loading dock area is generally located in the same location as currently exists and the 2 proposal not to enclose the dock is consistent with the existing dock. 3 4 5.6 The site currently includes very little landscaping and no storm water management, both 5 of which will be added to the project creating a dramatic improvement 6 7 5.7 The submitted GENERAL CONCEPT plan set is included for the City Council's 8 consideration. 9 10 6.0 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE COMMENTS/CONDITIONS: 11 6.1 The site must conform to the Larpenteur Avenue Streetscape Master Plan. Specifically, 12 decorative brick pillars, wrought iron fencing, stamped concrete walk, and landscaping 13 must be incorporated into the landscape plan adjacent to Larpenteur Avenue and north 14 along Fernwood Avenue to the first access, and similar to what exists east of the subject 15 site. 16 17 6.2 The applicant must provide the City with a site survey. Currently staff is unable to 18 determine whether proposed items lie within easements in and adjacent to Larpenteur and 19 Fernwood Avenues. A survey would also allow staff to determine whether additional 20 street right-of-way is required. 21 22 6.3 The submitted landscape plan indicates a coniferous screen on the northern slope 23 adjacent the apartment building. Staff supports this type of screening and will continue 24 working on a final plan. The proposed landscaping for the rest of the site will be a vast 25 improvement from the existing site. Staff will continues to work with Roundy's on a 26 final plan that meets the requirements of Section 1006 and 1010 of the Roseville City 27 Code. 28 29 6.4 The proposed building, as depicted on the elevation rendering, will include varying 30 heights and other features such as window and awnings to break-up wall massing. The 31 overall height of the proposed structure is 4O feet. Ancillary structures such as the open 32 market and coffee/caf6 will be limited to a height of 30 feet. 33 34 6.5 The City Planner is uncertain of the exact distance the proposed structure will be placed 35 for the west,, east,, and north property lines. It appears that the building will be 36 approximately 100 feet from the west property line, 45 feet from the east property line 37 and 80 feet from the north property line. Due to the difficulties in placing a new grocery 38 store on the subject parcel, one that utilizes the parcel efficiently, the Planning Division 39 is not opposed to the location of the proposed structure. An additional review by the 4O Planning Division regarding heightened Shopping Center District requirements is below. 41 42 43 44 45 PF'08-005—RCA-022508.doc Page 3 of I I