2011_0808_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

08 5.0 PUBLIC COMMENT 29 5.1 Planning Division staff has received several emails and phone calls about the proposed '30 PRELIMINARY PLAT from nearby property owners; the em ailed comments received up to the time this report was prepared are included as Attachment D. ' 2 5.2 At the duly-noticed public hearing held by the Planning Commission on March 2, 2011, '33 many people were present to speak about the PRELIMINARY PLAT. After closing the public hearing, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the proposal; '35 minutes from the public hearing are included with this staff report as Attachment E. '3 6 5.3 The City Council unanimously approved the PRELIMINARY PLAT on March 21, 2011 - an N3 7' excerpt of the meeting minutes is included with this staff report as Attachment F. ' 8 5.4 On April 5, 2011, the Roseville Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed the proposed 'N39 PLAT in light of the park dedication requirements of § 1103.07 of the City Code and 40 unanimously recommended to accept a cash dedication in lieu of land; minutes of the 41 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting are included with this staff report as 42 Attachment G. 4,'13 5.5 At the duly-noticed public hearing held by the Planning Commission on April 6, 2011, no 14,14, one was present to speak about the storm sewer EASEMENT VACATION. After closing the 145 public hearing, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the 146 proposal; minutes from the public hearing are included with this staff report as 4 7' Attachment H. 4 8 6. 0 STORM SEWER EASEMENT VACATION 149 In light of the fact that the storm sewer infrastructure is to be relocated and rebuilt within 50 public right-of-way and a newly-dedicated easement by the applicant as part of the 51 proposed FINAL PLAT, Public Works staff concurs with the recommendation of the 52 Planning Commission to approve the proposed storm sewer easement vacation. 5'3 7.0 FINAL PLAT AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT 54 7.1 Plat proposals are reviewed primarily for the purpose of ensuring that the proposed lots 55 and streets are compatible with broader pattern of development, that all proposed lots 56 meet the minimum size requirements of the zoning code, that adequate streets and other 5 7' public infrastructure are in place or identified and constructed, and that storm water is 58 addressed to prevent problems either on nearby property or within the storm water 59 system. 6o 7.2 All of the proposed lots meet the standards pertaining to size and configuration. 61 7.3 Based on the typical traffic patterns of one-family dwellings like those associated with 62 the proposed plat,, full development of the property would be expected to add 6'3 approximately 268 vehicle trips per day to the nearby road network. Roseville's &4 consulting traffic engineers have analyzed the proposed plat and determined that the 65 resulting development would not affect the nearby roadways and intersections enough 66 necessitate off-site mitigation improvements like turn lanes, traffic lights, or new 6 7' roadways; the study report is included with this staff report as Attachment C. The City 68 Engineer notes that there are items in the study that are not being recommended as 69 conditions at this time. PF I I -003RCA080811 (3).doc Page 2 of 4