Laserfiche WebLink
3. Best Value Procurement utilizing Arizona State University (ASU) a third party method <br /> 32 that was used for the Geothermal Project at the Skating Center. <br /> 33 Pros <br /> 34 • Accepted and tested method <br /> 35 • 98%performance record of on time and on budget <br /> 36 • Transfers risk to contractor <br /> 37 • Lower management inputs <br /> 38 • New approach for industry <br /> 39 • Becoming preferred method of high performing contractors <br /> 40 • Greater ability to minimize impact on users and operations <br /> 4 1 • Third party—increases transparency <br /> 42 Cons <br /> 43 * Upfront costs for owner and contractor <br /> 44 * Upfront time investment for owner and contractor <br /> 45 * May not obtain the lowest cost in the beginning <br /> 46 As the projects have been outlined and timing identified,the desired approach is to utilize <br /> 47 Arizona State University Best Value Process as used with the Skating Center geothermal project. <br /> 48 <br /> 49 The official Best Value Procurement method requires ASU as an outside agency. This <br /> 50 service/method is anticipated to improve results, save dollars along the way and in the end. This <br /> 5 1 method did prove to work well with the geothermal project; saving staff and project time, <br /> 52 limiting cost overruns and change orders and produced an excellent project. <br /> 53 <br /> 54 Included in your packet is a proposal from Arizona State University that staff will be prepared to <br /> 55 review with you at your meeting. <br /> 56 <br /> 57 POLICY OBJECTIVE <br /> 58 It is the policy of the City to use procurement methods that deliver the best value for the <br /> 59 community. <br /> 60 <br /> 6,,� BUDGET IMPLICATIONS <br /> 62 The total cost of utilizing Arizona State University for the four year program as outlined is <br /> 63 $200,000 plus a$15,000 license fee. The cost would be paid for out of the budgeted bond <br /> 64 proceeds for the identified planning and construction management costs. <br /> 65 <br /> 66 STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br /> &7 Based upon the multitude and variety of projects and aggressive timeframe, staff recommends <br /> 68 that the City enter into an agreement with Arizona State University in the not to exceed amount <br /> 69 of$215,000, including the license fee to implement the official Best Value Procurement Method <br /> for the Park Renewal Program. <br /> 71 <br /> "72 REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION <br /> "73 Motion to authorize the City Manager and Mayor to sign an agreement with Arizona State <br /> 74 University in the not to exceed amount of$215,000 to implement the official Best Value <br /> "75 Procurement Method for the Park Renewal Program as outlined with final City Attorney <br /> "76 approval. <br /> Prepared by: Lonnie Brold,,-,e,Director <br /> "78 Attachments: A: Arizona State University Best Value Education Proposal <br /> Page 2 of 2 <br />