Laserfiche WebLink
100 6.1 Planning Division staff has received a couple of phone calls from nearby property <br />101 owners. In each of these cases, people have been interested in what an ADU is and how it <br />102 would be regulated, but nobody has expressed concern with approving the proposal. <br />103 6.2 The Planning Commission held the duly- noticed public hearing for this application on <br />104 April 6, 2011; draft minutes from the public hearing were not available at the time this <br />105 report was prepared. The questions of the Commissioners centered more on the meeting's <br />106 subsequent agenda item pertaining to proposed additional Zoning Code requirements for <br />107 ADUs, and none of the Commissioners had significant concerns with the present <br />108 CONDITIONAL USE application. No one from the public addressed the Planning <br />109 Commission on this matter. After closing the public hearing, the Planning Commission <br />110 unanimously (i.e., by a vote of 7 -0) recommended that the application be approved based <br />111 on the findings identified in the staff report. <br />112 %.O RECOMMENDATION <br />113 Based on the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the comments and <br />114 findings outlined in Sections 4 -6 of this report, the Planning Division recommends <br />115 approval of the proposed CONDITIONAL USE pursuant to § 1004.07 and § 1009.02 of the <br />116 Roseville City Code. <br />117 8.0 SUGGESTED ACTION <br />118 Adopt a resolution approving the proposed accessory dwelling unit as a <br />119 CONDITIONAL USE at 3 091 Fairview Avenue, based on the comments and findings of <br />120 Sections 4 -6 and the recommendation of Section 7 of this staff report. <br />Prepared by: Associate Planner Bryan Lloyd <br />Attachments: A: Area map C: Proposed floor plans <br />B: Aerial photo D: Draft resolution <br />PF 11 -007 RCA 041811 <br />Page 4 of 4 <br />