1981_1012_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

APPLICANTS WRITTEN STATEMENT REZONING of 2635 FIS As stated on page 1 of the application that this statement is attached to, this property as it currently exists is perfectly suited for double occupancy} It was already so suited when purchased July 31, 1981. RAT TONAT,F 1. The first two pages of this attachment show the floor plans of the two proposed. units . Each level has full accomodations with 1 1 oar garages for each. The Fisk St. level has three bedrooms, living room, kitchen and full bath plus a redwood deck. The basement walkout apartment has one bedroom (with an oversized window for additional emergency exit), living room, kitchen, work room, 3/4 bath and a cement patio. The third page of this attachment shows pictures of the land site and how the house is situated on it. Dote that the property is a corner lot with four lane County Road c bordering the north side of it and Central Park located to the rear. This makes it quite an isolated lot and Drovides each tenant with -private and totally separate access to their main entrances and garages. The basement apartment enters from County Road C. The upper appa rimer eaters from Fisk. 3. The fourth page of this attachment contains signatures of nelghboy that do not contest the rezoning, Note that only two neighbors directly facing the property refused to sign The neighbor directly across the street preferred to remain formally neutral. He did state however that he was not opposed to the rezoning. The next door neighbor '.s opposed, The reason seems to be fear of their property being devalued which I disagree with. The property at 2635 Fisk was not purchased to ruin. A third neighbor directly facing the property was never dome in three attempts to contact him. He is located across county Road C on Terrace Drive. (see rough snap on page 5 showing locations of consenting neighbors., s UMMA RY The way this property is located and built proves its valldity to be a two family dwelling. signatures of consenting, immediate ne ighbort support this analy -s z s In my opinion, this property Is better situated than the R-2 zoning at the address of 634-36 c ty Rd C. Such zoning however mirrors the economical situation and needed housing trend. Multi family housing is not bad and that is being realized. This property can provide to young families quality low density suburban housing they cannot � otherwise afford. As it stands, the property is ready to provide that service.