My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1981_1012_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1981
>
1981_1012_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2012 10:15:04 AM
Creation date
1/9/2012 10:12:45 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APPLICANTS WRITTEN STATEMENT <br />REZONING of 2635 FIS <br />As stated on page 1 of the application that this statement is <br />attached to, this property as it currently exists is perfectly <br />suited for double occupancy} It was already so suited when <br />purchased July 31, 1981. <br />RAT TONAT,F <br />1. The first two pages of this attachment show the floor plans of <br />the two proposed. units . Each level has full accomodations with <br />1 1 oar garages for each. <br />The Fisk St. level has three bedrooms, living room, kitchen and <br />full bath plus a redwood deck. <br />The basement walkout apartment has one bedroom (with an oversized <br />window for additional emergency exit), living room, kitchen, <br />work room, 3/4 bath and a cement patio. <br />The third page of this attachment shows pictures of the land <br />site and how the house is situated on it. Dote that the property <br />is a corner lot with four lane County Road c bordering the north <br />side of it and Central Park located to the rear. This makes it <br />quite an isolated lot and Drovides each tenant with -private and <br />totally separate access to their main entrances and garages. The <br />basement apartment enters from County Road C. The upper appa rimer <br />eaters from Fisk. <br />3. The fourth page of this attachment contains signatures of nelghboy <br />that do not contest the rezoning, Note that only two neighbors <br />directly facing the property refused to sign <br />The neighbor directly across the street preferred to remain <br />formally neutral. He did state however that he was not opposed <br />to the rezoning. <br />The next door neighbor '.s opposed, The reason seems to be fear of <br />their property being devalued which I disagree with. The property <br />at 2635 Fisk was not purchased to ruin. <br />A third neighbor directly facing the property was never dome in <br />three attempts to contact him. He is located across county Road C <br />on Terrace Drive. (see rough snap on page 5 showing locations of <br />consenting neighbors., <br />s UMMA RY <br />The way this property is located and built proves its valldity to be <br />a two family dwelling. signatures of consenting, immediate ne ighbort <br />support this analy -s z s <br />In my opinion, this property Is better situated than the R-2 zoning <br />at the address of 634-36 c ty Rd C. Such zoning however mirrors the <br />economical situation and needed housing trend. Multi family housing <br />is not bad and that is being realized. This property can provide to <br />young families quality low density suburban housing they cannot � <br />otherwise afford. As it stands, the property is ready to provide <br />that service. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.