My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011_0509_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2011
>
2011_0509_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2012 4:26:05 PM
Creation date
1/9/2012 4:03:13 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
28 4.0 DEVELOPMENT BACKGROUND <br />29 4.1 On September 15, 2008 the City Council approved the original Applewood Pointe senior <br />30 cooperative at 3 010 and 3 008 Cleveland Avenue. This approval created an outlot that was to <br />31 potentially be used in the future for a second development by United Properties. <br />32 4.2 On October 13, 2008 the City Council approved the General Concept Planned Unit <br />33 Development for the Applewood Pointe assisted living facility at 2990 and 2996 Cleveland <br />34 Avenue and the residual Outlot A. <br />35 4.3 On August 17, 2009, United Properties sought and received City Council approval for an <br />36 amended project that reduced the 93 units of senior cooperative into a two phase development, <br />37 with the outlot and United Properties continued interest in the assisted living project. <br />38 4.4 Since the approvals, United Properties has had to overcome a number of challenges in the <br />39 housing market and financing such developments. However, the first phase of the senior <br />40 cooperative in now under construction (underground parking and first floor complete) and <br />41 United Properties has renewed interest in developing the assisted living project. <br />42 4.5 Also since the previous approvals, the City has adopted a new Zoning Ordinance which created <br />43 two high density districts, a number of new design standards, and eliminated planned unit <br />44 developments. Based on the parcel size, density, and building placement (very similar to the <br />45 previous approval), a rezoning and subdivision are necessary before final approvals can be <br />46 given to the project. <br />47 4.6 The proposal for the southern part of the property seeks to develop a 3 -story elongated 80 -unit <br />48 assisted - living facility (approximately 40 feet in height) that will integrate several types of <br />49 senior -care unit types, including memory care, assisted living, and independent living units <br />50 (with a breakdown of 24 memory care and 56 independent /assisted living with roughly 12 <br />51 independent and 44 assisted units). <br />52 4.7 The proposed building is generally located on eastern portion of the subject property with public <br />53 entrances from both Cleveland Avenue and planned Langton Lake Drive. Resident parking is <br />54 located under the building and is accessed via a driveway off of Langton Lake Drive. <br />55 4.8 On March 24, 2011, United Properties held the required open house regarding the rezoning and <br />56 preliminary plat. Two citizens attended the meeting and asked questions related to the project <br />57 and its relationship to the adjacent senior cooperative. Neither citizen indicated opposition to <br />58 the project <br />59 5.0 REZONING <br />6o 5.1 The subject Applewood Pointe area has a Comprehensive Plan — Land Use designation of High <br />61 Density Residential and a zoning classification of High Density Residential -1. <br />62 5.2 In October 2008 the General Concept Planned Unit Development sought and received approval <br />ss fora 93 unit, three and four -story assisted living residence on the existing two residential <br />64 parcels (2990 and 2996 Cleveland Avenue) and the Outlot platted with the senior cooperative. <br />65 5.3 In December 2011 the City Council adopted a new zoning ordinance and in so doing <br />66 incorporated many of the aspects utilized in planned unit development (PUD) review /approval <br />67 into the zoning ordinance, but eliminated PUD's. The Council also established a second high <br />ss density residential district with more flexible setbacks and no density limitations. <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.