My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_9386
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
09xxx
>
9300
>
res_9386
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 8:38:05 AM
Creation date
12/2/2004 9:13:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
9386
Resolution Title
Requesting representation from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust for appeal (3/10/97).
Resolution Date Passed
3/10/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> <br />* * * * * * * * * * * <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City <br />of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota was duly held on the 10th day of March, 1997, <br />at 6:30 p.m. <br /> <br />The following members were present: Mastel, Wiski, and Wall, and the following were <br />absent: Goedeke and Maschka. <br /> <br />Member Wiski introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 9386 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION REQUESTING REPRESENTATION FROM <br />LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INSURANCE TRUST <br />FOR APPEAL <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City of Roseville is a defendant along with the Minnesota Police <br />Recruitment System, a Minnesota joint powers organization ("MPRS"), and 35 other <br />Minnesota cities in two companion civil actions in Hennepin County District Court entitled <br />Fields v. MPRS et al. and Starks v. MPRS. et. aI., District Court File Numbers EM 93-218 <br />and EM 93-219 (collectively referred to as the "Action"); and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, by Order dated October 5, 1994, the Court found that the entry level police <br />officer selection procedures used by the defendants violated the Minnesota Human Rights <br />Act; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, by Order dated November 7, 1996, the Court made the defendants subject <br />to the continuing jurisdiction of the Court until January 1, 2004; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, said Orders establish standards for review of employee selection procedures <br />which will be extraordinarily difficult to satisfy; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, said Orders may be cited as precedent in future challenges to employee <br />selection procedures of Minnesota cities which will be defended by the League of <br />Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT); and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City and other defendant cities may have future employment practices <br />challenged in the context of the Action under the continuing jurisdiction of the Court, which <br />will be defended by the LMCIT; and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.