Laserfiche WebLink
Member Stenlund opined that organized collection was doable; and recommended <br />that the City move forward; however, with the caveat that providing choices on <br />the different colors and sizes for containers seemed important to residents. <br />Member Stenlund moved, Member Felice seconded, moving forward with a <br />recommendation to the City Council to pursue organized trash collection, <br />with an attempt to preserve as much as practical the current market share <br />percentages of independent haulers in the community; with the first step <br />asking staff to prepare a formal resolution for review and consideration by <br />the PWET Commissioners at their next meeting with the intent of moving the <br />recommendation forward to the City Council at a future date. <br />quantity of trash they're producing; <br />8) Provide customer choices to small waste generators as well as large <br />generators; <br />9) Choice of management; <br />10) Range of size in collection container and service options; <br />11) Ability for City to further negotiate for additional services, such as <br />curbside bulk waste collection <br />12) Management by and City costs will remain revenue neutral; <br />13) Maintain ability for existing haulers to retain their current or <br />comparable market share; and <br />14) Annual reports of tonnage, type of waste generated (e.g. hazardous, <br />general and recyclables), and other information as periodically requested <br />will be provided to assist the City in maintaining federal and county <br />mandates. <br />Page 9 of 17 <br />