Laserfiche WebLink
MEETING / <br />'REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MMEMMER-MEOW <br />ra": 4 L9 101 riwl <br />ORIGINATING T. IV.: T. HEAD APPROVAL. <br />Public Works - Code Division <br />ITEM DESCRIPTION: <br />MGR. REVIEWED/ RECOMMEN� <br />Ordinance an-e'ndina Roseville City Code <br />Sections 13.070 and 13.080 (fences) <br />Re: Elimination of Sections 13.070 and 13.080 from, the City Code of Roseville, <br />Code Sections 13.070 and 13.080 have created most of the problems regardina <br />enforcement of the city fence codes. I have discussed these code items with <br />the city planner and planning staff as to why they were included in the code. <br />After a thorough examination and discussion of all possible reasons as to why <br />these items viere included in the city code, I see no valid reason to continue <br />enforcement of these tvio code requirementsf <br />Section 13.070 is confusing because of the wording and las not a realistic, <br />a <br />wor�,able fence code requirement. There appears to be no reason to limit any <br />rear yard to this requirement when other rear yards can have a 6'6" height <br />and the adjoining side yard also can qo to a 6' 6" height. <br />This requirement of our present cit code eliminates the use of all factory <br />Y <br />made basket weave design fences and stockade type fences. These styles have <br />become very pcoular and are being sold and installed by most stores and lum-ber <br />yards . <br />RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorize City Attorney to _prepare amendment to Section <br />13.070 and 13.080 of the Roseville City Code, concerni <br />fences. <br />