Laserfiche WebLink
2 June 1982 <br />PLANNING REPORT <br />CASE NUMBER., 1370-82 <br />APPLICANT: David Ficek (DaVerne Corporation) <br />LOCATION: South Of County Road Dy Westerly of Old <br />Highway 8 <br />ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of Preliminary Plat <br />Special Use Permit for Planned Unit Development <br />PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: <br />1, The property in question consists of 4.3 acres, contiguous to and south of <br />County Road D. and is zoned R-6, Townhouse District, Mr, Ficek proposes to' <br />construct 33 townhouse units, which in accordance with the R-6 Zone require <br />a minimum of 4FOOO square feet per unit. The land as it has 187,308 square <br />feet producing a density of 5,676 square feet per unit. The proposal thus <br />meets and exceeds the density requirements. <br />2, Attached is a letter from the applicant and reduced copies of the Site <br />Plan, Utilities and Grading Plans, Landscape Plan, and plans for the <br />structures, <br />We have reviewed revised plans with the applicant over a period of time, <br />coordinating the grading plan meeting the Rice Creek Watershed requirements <br />with the location of the structures, and access drives, It would appear <br />to us and the City Engineering Staff that the proposed design fits the <br />property well, and provides attractive site conditions for the 33 units <br />proposed, <br />3. The basic unit footprint is 24 feet by 46 feet with approximately 1,100 <br />square footage in living spacer two bedrooms.,, and a double garage. <br />According to the applicant's letter, they are intended to sell in the <br />$75,000 range. The lower level of the units is constructed of brick, <br />with diagonal cedar siding above and asphalt shingles . As a Planned Unit <br />Development, the size of the units, exterior materials, the site and <br />landscape plans are all an integral part of the PUD submission. Thus, <br />the PTT if approved should be approved on the condition that the development <br />is constructed in accordance with plans submitted., <br />4. There may be a problem with respect to the dedication of right-of-way on <br />County Road D. This road is designated by the County as requiring 100 feet <br />of right-of-way. Existing property line is 33 feet from the center (a <br />normal two rod public right-of-way on either side of the center line <br />producing a 66 foot county roadway), Thus, there should be an additional <br />17 feet of right-of-way dedicated, whereas the plans indicate an additional <br />seven (7) foet. Also, the plans indicate a five (5) foot asphalt walkway, <br />