Laserfiche WebLink
�2&. <br />adjacent to the pedestal sign, only 4.8' are available from the <br />hack of the curb to the edge. of the sigM This does not appear to <br />he desirable, <br />If something less than-.. the 16.51 were to he desired as a solution <br />it is suggested that putting the pathway immediately on the <br />building side of the sign would he a reasonable solution. This <br />would then require 131 of dedication and a shift in the parking <br />lot of 6 1 . The 131 would allow for the 61 pathway with no obs truc- <br />tions.would not require either the sign or the light doles to have <br />to he relocated at this time, -would leave more than adequate area <br />for the parking lot shift toward the buildings and meet city stan- <br />dards, If this approach were ,followed, or others that would result <br />in the signs or the light standards being on the new p ortion of the <br />public right --of -way, then part of the agreement should he that the <br />facilities could stay inplaca by a permit for a period of u p to 0 <br />years, That would allow ample tame to amortize the investment and <br />to give the property owner the opportunity to plan for a renew lo- <br />cations <br />cvx /c <br />