My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1982_0726_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982
>
1982_0726_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2012 8:47:16 AM
Creation date
2/1/2012 8:43:35 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
June 1982 <br />PLANNING REPORT <br />CASE NUMBER: <br />APPLICANT: <br />LOCATION: <br />ACTION REQUESTED: <br />PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: <br />1370 --8 <br />DaviO Vice - (Laverne Corporation) <br />5 ®, <br />south of County Road D, Westerly of old <br />Highway 8 <br />Approval of Preliminary Plat <br />Special Use Permit for Planned Unit Development <br />1. The property in question consists of 4.3 acres, contiguous to and south of <br />County Road D, and is zoned R-- 6 , Townhouse Di s tri ic t . Mr. F i c ek proposes to <br />construct 33 townhouse units, which in accordance with the R-6 Zone require <br />a minimum of 4,Ooo square feet per unit* The land as it has 187 -1308 square <br />feet producing a density of 5,676 sguar a feet per uni t ft The proposal thus <br />meets and exceeds the density requirements. <br />2. Attached is a letter from the applicant and reduced copies of the Site <br />Plan, Utilities and Grading Plans :, Landscape Plan, and plans for the <br />structures, <br />We have reviewed revised plans with the applicant over a period of time, <br />coordinating the grading plan meeting the Rice Creek Watershed requirements <br />with the location of the structuries, and access drives. It would appear <br />to us and the City Engineering Staff that the proposed design fits the <br />property well, and provides attractive site conditions for the 33 units <br />proposed, <br />3. The basic unit footprint is 24 feet by 46 feet with approximately 1, 100 <br />square footage in living space, two bedrooms, and a double garage, <br />According to the applicant's letter, they are intended to sell in the <br />$ 7 5, oO o range, The lower level o f- the l un it s 'is constructed of brick, <br />with diagonal cedar siding above and asphalt shingles. As a Planned Unit <br />Development, the size of the units, exterior materials, the site and <br />landscape plans are all an integral part of the PUD submission. Thus, <br />the PUD if approved should be approved on the condition that the development <br />is constructed in accordance with plans submitted. <br />4. There may be a problem with respect to the dedication of right-of-way on <br />County Road D. This road is designated by the County as rewiring loo feet <br />of right -of-way. Existing property luxe is 33 feet from the center (a <br />normal two rod public right -of -way on either side of the center line <br />producing a 66 foot county roadway). Thus, there should be an additional <br />17 feet of right -of -way dedicated, whereas the plans indicate an additions <br />seven (7) feet. Also, the plans indicate a five foot asphalt walkway, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.