My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1979_0924_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1979
>
1979_0924_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/3/2012 4:20:29 PM
Creation date
2/3/2012 4:16:12 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M F4 0R A NI rL <br />27 Augusu 1979 <br />Page Four <br />Zoning .change 1E : new Mobile Home District (R -5) here and <br />e- im, " nate H -2 and R -3 zoning which currently exists. <br />This area is presently used for mobile homes. and <br />is adjacent to limited business and business areas <br />in Roseville. <br />Zorn ]4ng Change 17: Rezone from E -2 to newly established Highway <br />Commercial District (B -3) � This area is currently <br />used f or commerc is 1 and mobi le home s and i s shown <br />on they proposed Land Use Flan for public/semi- <br />public use* <br />Zoning Change 22. Rez one from current. )B- 2 to newly ' es table, shed <br />Highway commercial District (13-3). The area is <br />presently partially vacant and partially used for <br />commercial. The proposed Land. Use plan designates <br />the area for industrial/business. The adjacent <br />area in Roseville is designated for limited <br />business, business, and high - density residential., <br />Burlington T ie Little Canada Plan identifies the area along Rice-Street, from the <br />Nor L.h.e Railroad crossing south to Little Canada Road as an <br />area of potential' incompatible zoning between- communities, The Plan <br />identifies the border conflict as follows <br />'The development of contiguous: municipal boundaries is an <br />,issue in Little Canada. Conflicting or incompatible <br />zoning has at tunes allowed land useage , which if <br />controlled by a single governmental unit, would not be <br />necessarily considered desirable. Other instances <br />potentially could lead to increased demand. placed.-.upon <br />one munic' ality by the land useage of the other. <br />Examples of this would be..-the need for buffering <br />between Little Canada's commercial and industrial develop- <br />ment and Roseville ' s apartments." <br />We would concur that the commercial industrial uses along lice Street in <br />Little Canada have a deleterious impact on the residential uses adjacent <br />in Roseville and that every effort should be made to reduce these . impacts . <br />The transportation sect -.on of the Little Canada Plan identifies that the <br />major parking concerns are related to the provision of sufficient off- <br />street parking particularly along Rice street's commercial area. The <br />Plan calls for efforts to cluster and internalize - development with more <br />emphasis on the pedestrian. Joint use parking lots which are screened <br />and buffered are suggested. In addition, several intersections along <br />Rice Street are identified as congested or hazardous* These include the <br />intersections at Little Canada Road, County Roads C and H- 2 r and State <br />Highway 36. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.