My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1979_0820_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1979
>
1979_0820_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2012 9:00:21 AM
Creation date
2/8/2012 8:59:13 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-2- <br />V977-14 - Lexington Avenue North of E:arpenteur,, when the City 4 <br />acquired <br />easements across the Shopping Center operated by Imo'. Argolis on the west <br />side of Lexington, the easement agreement called for only a $1.00 payment <br />to the owner; This was in the expectation that the assessment of that <br />parcel would be deferred until such time as being connected to this line. <br />Such a situation had been indicated to Mr. Mar lis 6s pxd:)ab1e when the <br />hearing was originally held. The cost of constructing inn tie waterin across <br />Lexington Avenue itself is not included as assessable to any property, but <br />is proposed as a water system ewe for moving the system. All that. work <br />on the east side of Lexington, however, around the shopping center, along <br />Larpenteur,, was requested by the shopping center owner in lieu of doing the <br />work himself as he had or�ganally proposed# This work on the east side is <br />in addition to the original hearing and will be chaff loo % to that property <br />miner alone . <br />W-77-25 - Watermain worth of I�nxio Road for Har Mar Apartments. The cuner <br />of the apartments will, in all probabllmty, oppose the asses ents as not being <br />necessary or net totally serving his property, As you recall,, these Jzprovemnts <br />are primarily the result of requests from the Fire Deparbment based on the large <br />ner of mans and hazards involved. They serve no other properties. axed, <br />therefore, are assessable only against this one owner. The sex finer indicated <br />to staff that he is not satisfied with the repair 'work done, but several investi- <br />gations have lead the staff to conclude that the repair is in a .: higher quality <br />than the original existing lot.' <br />SS- Try -P-77- 27 - Transit, n2TLrid Marion This project has several different <br />assessrrent rates. The ektrerne easterly end near Rioe was a 9 ton design to <br />ac to the conraerci al developmnt that was anticipated and indeed is ncw <br />taking place. The north side of the .� ad., ad' acent to Mr. Cave's development, <br />was assessed at the full cost of ��ridge and Marion and for one half of <br />Transit where it abutts the s di s ion . The existing single fa�i ly lit at <br />the west end of the impro�nt is being assessed only the 22% F for <br />half of Transit Avenue, <br />ST-78-14 - Dellwood and Lase Place area. The railroad adj acmt to County <br />Road C has been included in the assessment notices on the project. This is <br />the first tirre the City has assessed railroad. property - for storm drainage <br />0 <br />mProvemnts, They obviously have water that flows off their right-of-way and <br />into the Fronts and according to our City Attorney are assessable i a <br />manner solar to any other property owner. <br />SS--W-P` 77- 4 -- Oxford Street Water, There are three corner lots facing Shryer <br />and Ryan which recei d notices for 25 feet of assessment on the water main <br />The City policy calls for such an assessment, but the Council has usually <br />dropped this type of assessment when the lots are already served from the <br />frontage street. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.