My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2005_0425
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2005
>
CC_Minutes_2005_0425
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:24:26 AM
Creation date
5/12/2005 9:09:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Ordinances
Meeting Date
5/9/2005
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />April 22, 2005 <br /> <br />Roseville City Council <br />2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Roseville~ MN 55113 <br /> <br />Dear Members of the Council: <br /> <br />I am writing to echo some concerns about the Twin Lakes project that were raised during <br />the public comments at the April 11 Town Hall meeting. They are not new concerns, <br />having been expressed at various times by members ofthe public at Council meetings. <br />With a project of the magnitudeproposed for Twin Lakes, I feel it is especially <br />incumbent on members of the Council to insure that its decisions with respect to this <br />project will be in the best interests of the citizens of Roseville. <br /> <br />Although I also have other concerns about this project; T am highlighting here two that I <br />think are especially important, both of them relating to responsible spendil!g of public <br />funds. It is my understanding that Roseville has a type of arrangement with the <br />developers who have proposed the Twin Lakesproject that essentially precludes the <br />possibility for the city to invite, much less consider, proposals from other potential <br />developers. I find this arrangement incomprehensible. To guarantee that Roseville gets <br />the best possible kind of use made of this unique parcel of land would seem to demand <br />obtaining the broadest possible spectrum of su,ggested uses, which of course would <br />require inviting proposals from multiple potential developers. <br /> <br />Just as serious, if not more so, is the amount of public money that appears to be required <br />for this project by the developers. I don't understand why the developers should not be <br />required to pay for the majority of what they are demanding in public funds. Considerin~ <br />a number of pressing needs overall in our community, there is no way that I could <br />conclude that the expenditure of $ 40 million, especially in the context of the kind of <br />exclusive arrangement that could require such an expenditure, represents anything like <br />good stewardship of city funds. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br /> <br />Thomas Sonten <br />1725 W. Eldridge Ave. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.