Laserfiche WebLink
6 11111 1 - We. <br />I I Ir <br />11,111 1 111111 Is 40 WI <br />X11JKffiW <br />AGPNDA SECTION' C)RIGtNATING DEPT./DIV.'.. <br />RtL ATS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PUBLIC WORKS <br />ITEM NO.'. ITEM DESCRIPTiO, . <br />AUTHORIZATION FOR REVISED FEASI'BILITY STUDY' <br />FG-R CO. RD, C PAVING FROM CLEVELAND TO WEST P-75.9* <br />4E <br />DEPT. HEAD APPROVAL, <br />MGR. FJF.,V1EWED/REC0MMENQS-. <br />- 1) <br />The <br />county has <br />now ■found out fro-m.the MN/Dot, who Would <br />1� - <br />be funding <br />theproject, that <br />the State wi I I <br />only fund approximat.ely -70 of the cost <br />% <br />for 6'e <br />wtorm drainage. <br />The <br />county is, <br />therefore, requestlng the city to paY 30% <br />of the <br />cost- as this is <br />the <br />portion of <br />water coming into the st6rm drain from- priovate <br />pro- <br />7,erties, rather <br />than <br />the right of way. This would come to approximately <br />$33,000 cost <br />to the cl ty, <br />2) The cost of the curb and gutter has gone up considerably from $3,44 <br />ppr foot to $6.18, based on the 1977 estimate. By r the work i's actually <br />9 1 igure could easily be over $7.00 per foot or double the orig'l- <br />done in 1 79- th"s f <br />nal estimate., <br />It i's, therefore, nece�ssary to, once again, go through the process of havinq a <br />feasibility S'tudy and publAc hearing for -this projectO <br />RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adoption of a resolution ordering the preparation of a revisei <br />feasibility report for the imp-rovement of County.Road C from <br />Cleveland Avenue to Old Hwy. 8, ideintified as Project P-75-13. <br />