My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2005_0418
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2005
>
CC_Minutes_2005_0418
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:24:29 AM
Creation date
5/12/2005 9:56:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
4/18/2005
Meeting Type
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Study Session - 04/18/05 <br />Minutes - Page 11 <br /> <br />documents and pricing; and TCE groundwater analysis to-date <br />and remediation. <br /> <br />Ilecess Ilecess <br />Mayor Klausing recessed the meeting at approximately 8:43 p.m. <br />and reconvened at 8:50 p.m. <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />Discuss Draft Councilllules of Procedure <br />Noting areas of consensus and lack thereof, Mayor Klausing <br />opined that revisions to the proposed Roseville City Council <br />Rules of Procedure needed to be voted up or down, amended or <br />eliminated. <br /> <br />Councilmember Schroeder requested written comments be <br />provided to staff and fellow Councilmembers from Mayor <br />Klausing and Councilmember Maschka to determine further <br />consensus items. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kough concurred; and requested discussion time <br />for several items at tonight's meeting. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing advised that prior to Council action, public <br />comment would be received as appropriate. <br /> <br />No action was taken. <br /> <br />7. <br /> <br />Discuss City Council Goal Setting <br />City Manager Beets reviewed Department Head identification of <br />"Big Issues" for the City in 2006 and beyond, and requested that <br />the City Council prioritize individually and return those to staff; <br />followed by calculation of Council aggregate priorities and <br />perspectives as the staff begins initial work, on a department <br />level, on the 2006 Budget. Mr. Beets noted that a ranking <br />structure could then be used for discussion purposes and <br />reflection of City Councilmembers. <br /> <br />Councilmember Maschka opined that, beyond budgetary <br />parameters, there were global issues that needed review (i.e., <br />housing) and a work program needed to be developed for the <br />remainder of the year. Councilmember Maschka further opined <br />that this was a good start, but further discussion and refinement <br /> <br />Discuss Draft <br />Councilllules of <br />Procedure <br /> <br />Discuss City <br />Council Goal <br />Setting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.